Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636590›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2023

Neonatal screening for isovaleric aciduria: Reducing the increasingly high false-positive rate in Germany.

Simona Murko, Asra Dadkhah Aseman, Friederike Reinhardt, Gwendolyn Gramer, Jürgen Günther Okun, Ulrike Mütze, René Santer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona MurkoNewborn Screening and Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-4600
Asra Dadkhah AsemanNewborn Screening and Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Friederike ReinhardtNewborn Screening and Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Gwendolyn GramerNewborn Screening and Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Jürgen Günther OkunDivision of Child Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Dietmar Hopp Metabolic Center, Center for Child and Adolescent Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Ulrike MützeDivision of Child Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Dietmar Hopp Metabolic Center, Center for Child and Adolescent Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
René SanterNewborn Screening and Metabolic Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics University Medical Center Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) for isovaleric acidemia (IVA) is performed by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry quantifying C5 carnitines (C5). Isovalerylcarnitine, however, is isomeric with pivaloylcarnitine which can be present in blood due to maternal use of pivaloylester-containing antibiotics, available in Germany since late 2016. During a 36-month period (January 19-December 21), all newborns screened in Hamburg with a C5 above cutoff (NeoGram®: 0.50 μmol/L or Neobase®2: 0.45 μmol/L) were included in the study. As a second-tier test, a simple ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed to differentiate the C5 isomers pivaloyl-, 2-methylbutyryl-, isovaleryl-, and valerylcarnitine. Out of 156 772 newborns tested, one turned out to have genetically proven IVA while 99 were false positive (C5: 0.5-8.2 μmol/L) due to the presence of pivaloylcarnitine. These cases have increased year by year and show local clusters. Retrospective analysis of another 39 cases from 287 206 neonates tested at the NBS center in Heidelberg with C5 elevation (0.9-10.6 μmol/L) but clinical and biochemical exclusion of IVA yielded evidence of pivaloylcarnitine in all cases. Inclusion of a second-tier test into NBS significantly reduces the high and increasing false-positive rate of IVA screening. This avoids further diagnostic steps, prevents unnecessary stress and anxiety of parents in a remarkably high number of cases. If Hamburg data of 2021 are extrapolated to all of Germany, one can assume around 800 (1‰) false-positive cases in comparison to an average of two classic IVA cases per year. Unless licensing of pivaloylester-containing drugs for use during pregnancy is reconsidered, a second-tier test for C5 determination is indispensable.

Indexed as

isovaleric aciduriaIVAnewborn screeningpivaloylcarnitinesecond‐tierUPLC‐MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID36636590
PMCPMC9830014
OpenAlexW4307728577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.