ArticleJIMD reports2023
Neonatal screening for isovaleric aciduria: Reducing the increasingly high false-positive rate in Germany.
Article in JIMD reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of the Gut-Liver-Kidney Axis in Disease Manifestation and Biomarker Alterations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Neurological Outcomes of Newborn Screening-Identified Isovaleric Acidemia: A Case Series Exploring Initial C5 Acylcarnitine Levels.JIMD reports · 2026Article
- Practical Considerations for the Diagnosis and Management of Isovaleryl-CoA-Dehydrogenase Deficiency (Isovaleric Acidemia): Systematic Search and Review and Expert Opinions.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
- Beyond Targeted Newborn Screening: A Nontargeted Metabolomics Workflow to Investigate Birthweight-Metabolome Correlations.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Methods Improve Specificity in Newborn Screening for Isovaleric Aciduria.Metabolites · 2023Article
- Neonatal screening for isovaleric aciduria: Reducing the increasingly high false-positive rate in Germany.JIMD reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for isovaleric acidemia (IVA) is performed by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry quantifying C5 carnitines (C5). Isovalerylcarnitine, however, is isomeric with pivaloylcarnitine which can be present in blood due to maternal use of pivaloylester-containing antibiotics, available in Germany since late 2016. During a 36-month period (January 19-December 21), all newborns screened in Hamburg with a C5 above cutoff (NeoGram®: 0.50 μmol/L or Neobase®2: 0.45 μmol/L) were included in the study. As a second-tier test, a simple ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed to differentiate the C5 isomers pivaloyl-, 2-methylbutyryl-, isovaleryl-, and valerylcarnitine. Out of 156 772 newborns tested, one turned out to have genetically proven IVA while 99 were false positive (C5: 0.5-8.2 μmol/L) due to the presence of pivaloylcarnitine. These cases have increased year by year and show local clusters. Retrospective analysis of another 39 cases from 287 206 neonates tested at the NBS center in Heidelberg with C5 elevation (0.9-10.6 μmol/L) but clinical and biochemical exclusion of IVA yielded evidence of pivaloylcarnitine in all cases. Inclusion of a second-tier test into NBS significantly reduces the high and increasing false-positive rate of IVA screening. This avoids further diagnostic steps, prevents unnecessary stress and anxiety of parents in a remarkably high number of cases. If Hamburg data of 2021 are extrapolated to all of Germany, one can assume around 800 (1‰) false-positive cases in comparison to an average of two classic IVA cases per year. Unless licensing of pivaloylester-containing drugs for use during pregnancy is reconsidered, a second-tier test for C5 determination is indispensable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.