Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636551›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Highly sensitive liquid biopsy Duplex sequencing complements tissue biopsy to enhance detection of clinically relevant genetic variants.

Ariane Hallermayr, Teresa M Neuhann, Verena Steinke-Lange, Florentine Scharf, Andreas Laner, Roland Ewald, Ben Liesfeld, Elke Holinski-Feder, Julia M A Pickl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Liquid Biopsy: minimal-invasive analysis of somatic alterations.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  7. The utility of liquid biopsy in clinical genetic diagnosis of cancer and monogenic mosaic disorders.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ariane HallermayrMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Teresa M NeuhannMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Verena Steinke-LangeMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Florentine ScharfMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Andreas LanerMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Roland EwaldLimbus Medical Technologies GmbH, Rostock, Germany.
Ben LiesfeldLimbus Medical Technologies GmbH, Rostock, Germany.
Elke Holinski-FederMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.
Julia M A PicklMGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) is a promising complement to tissue biopsy for detection of clinically relevant genetic variants in cancer and mosaic diseases. A combined workflow to enable parallel tissue and LB analysis is required to maximize diagnostic yield for patients. Methods: We developed and validated a cost-efficient combined next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow for both tissue and LB samples, and applied Duplex sequencing technology for highly accurate detection of low frequency variants in plasma. Clinically relevant cutoffs for variant reporting and quantification were established. Results: We investigated assay performance characteristics for very low amounts of clinically relevant variants. In plasma, the assay achieved 100% sensitivity and 92.3% positive predictive value (PPV) for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 91.7% sensitivity and 100% PPV for insertions and deletions (InDel) in clinically relevant hotspots with 0.5-5% variant allele frequencies (VAFs). We further established a cutoff for reporting variants (i.e. Limit of Blank, LOB) at 0.25% VAF and a cutoff for quantification (i.e. Limit of Quantification, LOQ) at 5% VAF in plasma for accurate clinical interpretation of analysis results. With our LB approach, we were able to identify the molecular cause of a clinically confirmed asymmetric overgrowth syndrome in a 10-year old child that would have remained undetected with tissue analysis as well as other molecular diagnostic approaches. Conclusion: Our flexible and cost-efficient workflow allows analysis of both tissue and LB samples and provides clinically relevant cutoffs for variant reporting and precise quantification. Complementing tissue analysis by LB is likely to increase diagnostic yield for patients with molecular diseases.

Indexed as

analytical validationasymmetric overgrowth syndromecancercirculating tumor DNADuplex sequencingliquid biopsytissue biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36636551
PMCPMC9831673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.