Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636473›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2022

Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats.

Vincent Bombail, Sarah M Brown, Jessica E Martin, Simone L Meddle, Michael Mendl, Emma S J Robinson, Tayla J Hammond, Birte L Nielsen, Megan R LaFollette, Ignacio Vinuela-Fernandez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent BombailAnimal Behaviour and Welfare group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, EH9 3RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3313-2854
Sarah M BrownThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-0721
Jessica E MartinThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0294-8770
Simone L MeddleThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5629-1332
Michael MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-1871
Emma S J RobinsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Tayla J HammondAnimal Behaviour and Welfare group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, EH9 3RG, UK.
Birte L NielsenUniversities Federation for Animal Welfare, Wheathampstead, AL4 8AN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-6329
Megan R LaFolletteThe North American 3Rs Collaborative, Denver, CO, 80202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0643-2210
Ignacio Vinuela-FernandezBioresearch Veterinary Services, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Emma K L TiveyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Alistair B LawrenceAnimal Behaviour and Welfare group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, EH9 3RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2083-4243
Roslin Institute · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBScotland's Rural College · GBUniversities Federation for Animal Welfare · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rat tickling is a heterospecific interaction for experimenters to mimic the interactions of rat play, where they produce 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (USV), symptoms of positive affect; tickling can improve laboratory rat welfare. The standard rat tickling protocol involves gently pinning the rat in a supine position. However, individual response to this protocol varies. This suggests there is a risk that some rats may perceive tickling as only a neutral experience, while others as a positive one, depending on how tickling is performed. Based on our research experiences of the standard tickling protocol we have developed a playful handling (PH) protocol, with reduced emphasis on pinning, intended to mimic more closely the dynamic nature of play. We will test whether our PH protocol gives rise to more uniform increases in positive affect across individuals relative to protocols involving pinning. We will compare the response of juvenile male and female Wistar rats as: Control (hand remains still against the side of the test arena), P0 (PH with no pinning), P1 (PH with one pin), P4 (PH with four pins). P1 and P4 consist of a background of PH, with treatments involving administration of an increasing dosage of pinning per PH session. We hypothesise that rats exposed to handling protocols that maximise playful interactions (where pinning number per session decreases) will show an overall increase in total 50 kHz USV as an indicator of positive affect, with less variability. We will explore whether behavioural and physiological changes associated with alterations in PH experience are less variable. We propose that maximising the numbers of rats experiencing tickling as a positive experience will reduce the variation in response variables affected by tickling and increase the repeatability of research where tickling is applied either as a social enrichment or as a treatment.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareHuman-Animal InteractionRats, WistarAnimalsFemaleMaleRatsUltrasonicsVocalization, Animalaffective neurosciencelaboratory animal welfareplayful handlingpositive animal welfareprotocolrat tickling

Identifiers

PMID36636473
PMCPMC9811030.2
OpenAlexW4296246725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.