Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636413›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2022

Role of ctDNA for the detection of minimal residual disease in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Michela Verzè, Monica Pluchino, Alessandro Leonetti, Matilde Corianò, Francesco Bonatti, Maria P Armillotta, Fabiana Perrone, Miriam Casali, Roberta Minari, Marcello Tiseo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular switch-mediated detection ofBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Liquid biopsy techniques and lung cancer: diagnosis, monitoring and evaluation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michela VerzèMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Monica PluchinoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Alessandro LeonettiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Matilde CorianòMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesco BonattiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria P ArmillottaMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Fabiana PerroneMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Miriam CasaliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Roberta MinariMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Marcello TiseoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Operable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high risk of recurrence, mainly due to remnant clones of the disease defined as minimal residual disease (MRD). Adjuvant chemotherapy has a limited efficacy in reducing the risk of relapse, and prognostic as well as predictive biomarkers in this context are currently missing. Methods: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the state of the art about the role of circulating tumor DNA detection through liquid biopsy for the assessment of MRD in resected early-stage NSCLC patients. Results: Among the 650 studies identified, 13 were eligible and included. Although highly heterogeneous, all the studies demonstrated a poor prognosis in patients with post-operative MRD, with a detection rate ranging from 6% to 45%. MRD detection preceded radiographic/clinical recurrence by a mean of 5.5 months. MRD positive patients were most likely to benefit from adjuvant treatment in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS). Consistently, adjuvant therapy did not minimize the risk of relapse in the MRD negative group. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy has a relevant role in assessing post-surgical MRD in resected NSCLC. Since currently there are no criteria other than stage and risk factors for the choice of adjuvant treatment in this setting, post-operative assessment of MRD through liquid biopsy might be a promising approach to guide the decision.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapycirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)minimal residual disease (MRD)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID36636413
PMCPMC9830273
OpenAlexW4313535308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.