Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636347›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Face familiarity detection with complex synapses.

Li Ji-An, Fabio Stefanini, Marcus K Benna, Stefano Fusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li Ji-AnZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Fabio StefaniniZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Marcus K BennaZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Stefano FusiZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity is a complex phenomenon involving multiple biochemical processes that operate on different timescales. Complexity can greatly increase memory capacity when the variables characterizing the synaptic dynamics have limited precision, as shown in simple memory retrieval problems involving random patterns. Here we turn to a real-world problem, face familiarity detection, and we show that synaptic complexity can be harnessed to store in memory a large number of faces that can be recognized at a later time. The number of recognizable faces grows almost linearly with the number of synapses and quadratically with the number of neurons. Complex synapses outperform simple ones characterized by a single variable, even when the total number of dynamical variables is matched. Complex and simple synapses have distinct signatures that are testable in experiments. Our results indicate that a system with complex synapses can be used in real-world tasks such as face familiarity detection.

Indexed as

Applied computingArtificial intelligenceNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36636347
PMCPMC9829748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.