ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023
Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Community Pharmacy Services: A Large Regional Study at Punjab, Pakistan.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual Perceptions and Self-Care Practices for Abdominal Pain: A Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted in Italian Community Pharmacies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Willingness, Self-Perceived Barriers, and Practices of Pharmacists Toward Extended Pharmacy Services for Health Promotion: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Karachi, Pakistan.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Clinical Pharmacist Communication and Its Association with Treatment-Related Problems: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jordanian Public Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patient Experiences With Outpatient Pharmacy Services in Hospitals Using Automated Pharmacy Systems: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Quality of pharmacy services and adherence to good pharmacy practice at points of sale in Punjab, Pakistan: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Patients' Contentment with Wasfaty and Health Services in Community Pharmacies in Tabuk and the Factors Associated with It.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Minding the gap: Assessing patient expectations versus experiences in drug information services at community health centers (Narra J · 2024Article
- Patient's satisfaction level with community pharmacies services in Romania: a questionnaire-based study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Perceptions of Clients on a University-based Drug Information Service affecting Medication Safety.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Comparing Patient Satisfaction with Automated Drug Dispensing System and Traditional Drug Dispensing System: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Beyond satisfaction in person-centered pharmacy services.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Outpatients satisfaction and perceptions toward pharmaceutical services in public and private hospitals in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patient satisfaction can be used to assess the quality of services provided at pharmacies. Our aim was to determine the level of patient satisfaction with pharmacy services and related factors at community pharmacies located in Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2021 to July 2021 by administering the questionnaire to the patients using stratified random sampling method. Survey instrument comprised 4 sections including demographics, satisfaction towards provision of facilities, the provision of information, their accessibility to patients, the relationship between pharmacists and patients and the continuity of care provided. Categorical data were represented by percentages. Descriptive statistics were calculated for satisfaction scores. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to find the odds ratios. A Results: Response rate of the survey was 92%. Only 30% of patients agreed that the pharmacist was available for counseling on their visit. About 52% agreed that the counseling time provided by pharmacist was enough. Most of the pharmacy patients (61%) trusted the pharmacist regarding any query about medicine and were satisfied with the way the pharmacist resolved issues. Mean satisfaction score of the pharmacy patients was 45.75 with a range of 25 (highly satisfied) to 66 (highly dissatisfied). Conclusion: The provision of community pharmacy services to patients was not satisfactory. Furthermore, the absence of pharmacist in the pharmacy and the lack of provision for counseling time raised concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.