ArticleHeliyon2022
The use of an ultrasonic curettage device in orthognathic surgery decreases surgery-related blood loss.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the use of a powered instrument (PI) and ultrasonic curettage device (ULCD) with intraoperative blood loss (IOBL), drain volume (DV), calculated blood loss (CBL), and hidden blood loss (HBL) in orthognathic surgery. Methods: We included 163 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery in our department. CBL was calculated from the preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels using the "hemoglobin balance method." CBL is an indicator of the amount of perioperative blood loss. HBL was calculated by subtracting IOBL and DV from CBL. Results: The PI group consisted of 61 patients (17 males and 44 females, age: 24.9 ± 9.5 years), and the ULCD group consisted of 102 patients (40 males and 62 females, age: 23.1 ± 7.8 years). In the PI group, the median IOBL, DV, CBL, and HBL were 540.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 380.0-670.0), 113.0 (IQR 77.0-147.0), 1000.0 (IQR 751.4-1248.6), and 285.8 (IQR 151.0-476.4) ml, respectively. In the ULCD group, the median IOBL, DV, CBL, and HBL were 327.5 (IQR 200.0-455.0), 105.5 (IQR 75.3-136.0), 759.5 (IQR 594.9-944.2), and 294.2 (IQR 120.8-456.9) ml, respectively. IOBL and CBL were significantly reduced with ULCD use, but no significant differences were observed in DV and HBL. Conclusions: This study showed that IOBL decreased with ULCD use, resulting in a decrease in CBL. Conversely, bleeding parameters (DV and HBL), which reflect the amount of bleeding that occurs after wound closure, did not show a decrease with ULCD use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.