ArticleDiabetology international2023
Clinical significance of tumor markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Diabetology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor Markers and Pancreatic Enzymes Reflect Early Pancreatic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes.Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- The Effect of Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic on the Metabolic Tumor Markers: A Real-World Retrospective Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To cross-sectionally and longitudinally investigate the association between tumor markers (Cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)) and malignancies in type 2 diabetes patients without evidence of malignancy. Materials and Methods: The study included 707 patients admitted for the treatment of diabetes from 1 August 2010 to 1 September 2018. Serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were measured for screening of malignancies at admission. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and endoscopy were performed for close examination. The percentage of patients diagnosed with malignancy was calculated, and among those without malignancy, the incidence of malignancies was examined after discharge. Results: A total of 26 patients (3.7%) were newly diagnosed with malignancy during hospitalization. The optimal cut-off value of CEA and CA19-9 by receiver operating characteristic analysis was 5.0 ng/mL and 75 U/mL, and their positive predictive values (PPV) were 8.7% and 22.5%, respectively. The addition of CA19-9 to age, smoking status, body mass index, and glycated hemoglobin significantly improved classification performance for malignancy using net reclassification improvement (0.682, 95% CI 0.256-1.107) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.150, 95% CI 0.007-0.294). Among 681 patients without malignancies during hospitalization, 30 patients (4.4%) developed malignancies during an average follow-up of 3.9 years. CA19-9 (hazard ratio: 1.005, 95% CI: 1.003-1.008) was associated with the development of malignancies. Conclusions: PPV of serum CEA and CA19-9 for detecting malignancy was high in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control. Measuring CA19-9 was found to be valuable to cross-sectionally and longitudinally detect malignancies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-022-00594-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.