ArticleDiabetology international2023
Accuracy of the Contour
Article in Diabetology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Self-monitoring of blood glucose is a useful method for monitoring blood glucose. It is often a key role of a management plan to reduce glycemic variability and diabetic complications. Wireless monitoring systems to connect blood glucose and insulin pumps can facilitate glycemic control. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of Contour Methods: In this study, finger-stick samples from 59 individuals were collected at the Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital. Blood glucose concentrations were measured with the monitoring systems against an available reference. We evaluated the accuracy of the system based on the ISO 15197:2013 Section 6.3 accuracy criteria. Results: In the present study, 100% of the results fulfilled the ISO 15197:2013 Section 6.3 accuracy criteria (95% within ± 15 mg/dL or ± 15% of reference for glucose < 100 and ≥ 100 mg/dL, respectively). The Parkes-Consensus Error Grid analysis showed that 100% of the results fulfilled within Zone A. Conclusions: The Contour
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.