Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636032›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023

The Bone Bridge for Tibial ACL Graft Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis of Different Tibial Fixation Methods for ACL Reconstruction.

Christian Peez, Marvin Greßmann, Michael J Raschke, Johannes Glasbrenner, Thorben Briese, Andre Frank, Elmar Herbst, Christoph Kittl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian PeezDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Marvin GreßmannDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael J RaschkeDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Johannes GlasbrennerDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thorben BrieseDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andre FrankDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Elmar HerbstDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Christoph KittlDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The tibial fixation site is considered the weak link in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and conflicting results regarding the biomechanical properties of various fixation methods have been reported. Purpose: To examine knots tied over a bone bridge and its biomechanical properties as a suitable tibial fixation method in ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: We divided 40 fresh-frozen porcine tibiae into 4 equal groups to evaluate flexor tendon grafts set with standard tibial fixation techniques: (1) bone bridge (BB group), (2) suspension button (SB group), (3) combined interference screw and bone bridge (IFS/BB group), and (4) combined interference screw and suspension button (IFS/SB group). Each construct was subjected to cyclic loading (1500 cycles, 50-250 N, 1 Hz) with a servohydraulic materials testing machine to measure elongation; load-to-failure testing (displacement rate: 25 mm/s) was then performed. Load to failure, stiffness, and yield load were compared between constructs using 1-way analysis of variance. Results: The hybrid fixation constructs (IFS/BB and IFS/SB groups) showed significantly better biomechanical properties than the isolated extracortical fixation constructs (BB and SB groups) ( Conclusion: Hybrid fixation had superior biomechanical performance compared with isolated extracortical fixation. However, tibial graft fixation using a bone bridge either as isolated extracortical fixation or combined with an interference screw for hybrid fixation showed equivalent biomechanical properties compared with suspension button-based graft fixation. Clinical Relevance: The clinical use of a bone bridge for tibial graft fixation could reduce the cost for ACL reconstruction and lower the rate of implant-associated issues.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionanterior cruciate ligamentbiomechanicsbone bridgegraft fixationhybrid fixation

Identifiers

PMID36636032
PMCPMC9830095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.