Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635962›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Cell size and actin architecture determine force generation in optogenetically activated cells.

T Andersen, D Wörthmüller, D Probst, I Wang, P Moreau, V Fitzpatrick, T Boudou, U S Schwarz, M Balland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanical cues regulateMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

T AndersenUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
D WörthmüllerInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; BioQuant-Center for Quantitative Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
D ProbstInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; BioQuant-Center for Quantitative Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
I WangUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
P MoreauUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
V FitzpatrickUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
T BoudouUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
U S SchwarzInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; BioQuant-Center for Quantitative Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.
M BallandUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, F-38000 Grenoble, France. Electronic address: martial.balland@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies · DELaboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique · FRHeidelberg University · DEUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherent cells use actomyosin contractility to generate mechanical force and to sense the physical properties of their environment, with dramatic consequences for migration, division, differentiation, and fate. However, the organization of the actomyosin system within cells is highly variable, with its assembly and function being controlled by small GTPases from the Rho family. To understand better how activation of these regulators translates into cell-scale force generation in the context of different physical environments, here we combine recent advances in non-neuronal optogenetics with micropatterning and traction force microscopy on soft elastic substrates. We find that, after whole-cell RhoA activation by the CRY2/CIBN optogenetic system with a short pulse of 100 ms, single cells contract on a minute timescale in proportion to their original traction force, before returning to their original tension setpoint with near perfect precision, on a longer timescale of several minutes. To decouple the biochemical and mechanical elements of this response, we introduce a mathematical model that is parametrized by fits to the dynamics of the substrate deformation energy. We find that the RhoA response builds up quickly on a timescale of 20 s, but decays slowly on a timescale of 50 s. The larger the cells and the more polarized their actin cytoskeleton, the more substrate deformation energy is generated. RhoA activation starts to saturate if optogenetic pulse length exceeds 50 ms, revealing the intrinsic limits of biochemical activation. Together our results suggest that adherent cells establish tensional homeostasis by the RhoA system, but that the setpoint and the dynamics around it are strongly determined by cell size and the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton, which both are controlled by the extracellular environment.

Indexed as

ActinsActomyosinActin CytoskeletonCell SizeActinsActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID36635962
PMCPMC9989885
OpenAlexW4315652065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.