Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635709›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Effects of storage conditions and digestion time on DNA amplification of biting midge (Culicoides) blood meals.

Ben Bellekom, Abigail Bailey, Marion England, Zoe Langlands, Owen T Lewis, Talya D Hackett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Culicoides biting midges in urban areas of northern Spain.Medical and veterinary entomology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Host Associations ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben BellekomDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK. ben.bellekom@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Abigail BaileyDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Marion EnglandThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Zoe LanglandsThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Owen T LewisDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Talya D HackettDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
University of Oxford · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GBMansfield University · US

Funding

NERC-Oxford University Environmental Research Doctoral Training Partnership NE/L002612/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular analysis of blood meals is increasingly used to identify the hosts of biting insects such as midges and mosquitoes. Successful host identification depends on the availability of sufficient host DNA template for PCR amplification, making it important to understand how amplification success changes under different storage conditions and with different durations of blood meal digestion within the insect gut before being placed into the storage medium.

methodWe characterised and compared the digestion profile of two species of Culicoides over a 96-h period using a novel set of general vertebrate primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene. A set number of individuals from each species were killed over 13 time points post-blood feeding and preserved in 95% ethanol. Samples were stored either at ambient room temperature or in a - 20 °C freezer to examine the effect of storage condition on the PCR amplification success of host DNA.

resultsWe found that amplification success across the 96-h sampling period post-feeding was reduced from 96 to 6% and 96% to 14% for Culicoides nubeculosus and Culicoides sonorensis, respectively. We found no effect of storage condition on PCR amplification success, and storage in 95% ethanol was sufficient to maintain high rates of amplifiable host DNA for at least 9 months, even at room temperature.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the limited time frame during which an individual may contain amplifiable host DNA and demonstrate the importance of timely sample capture and processing post-blood feeding. Moreover, storage in 95% ethanol alone is sufficient to limit host DNA degradation. These results are relevant to the design of studies investigating the biting behaviour and disease transmission potential of Culicoides and other biting Diptera.

Indexed as

CeratopogonidaeAnimalsDigestionDNAEthanolFeeding BehaviorHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNAEthanolRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiting dipteraBlood mealCulicoidesDNA degradationDNA digestionMetabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID36635709
PMCPMC9837887
OpenAlexW4315776832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.