ReviewBMC nephrology2023
Peritoneal dialysis related eosinophilic peritonitis: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score-matched comparison.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A case of systemic contact dermatitis associated with a peritoneal dialysis catheter and treated with dupilumab.CEN case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis, caused by superior mesenteric artery thrombosis with intestinal necrosis: a case report.CEN case reports · 2025Article
- Sterile inflammation of peritoneal membrane caused by peritoneal dialysis: focus on the communication between immune cells and peritoneal stroma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Culture-Negative Peritonitis and the Latest Diagnostic Techniques.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvert eosinophilic peritonitis (EP) is a relatively uncommon complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), although not rare. Here we reported a case of EP relieved after changing dialysate. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year old male patient developed cloudy PD effluents within the first month after PD started. Cytological study of PD effluents showed elevated white blood cells and polynuclear cells. Bacteria culture of PD effluents repeated for several times were all negative, and no pathogen was found by metagenomics next generation sequencing (mNGS). Antibiotic therapy for 28-day was ineffective. Based on these and increased eosinophils in peritoneal fluid, he was finally diagnosed as EP. PD dialysate was changed (consists of the same buffer agent and electrolytes, but is packed in bags that do not contain PVC), and the patient's PD effluent became clear. Of note, EP did not relapse 5 months later when the patient started to use the former PD solution again.
conclusionAlthough PD effluent turbidity almost always represents infectious peritonitis, there are other differential diagnoses including EP. For patients with cloudy fluid accompanied by mild symptoms who do not response to antibiotic therapy, it is reasonable to consider the possibility of this disease. EP tends to heal spontaneously, however, antihistamines or glucocorticoids are required sometimes to avoid catheter obstruction. For patients with no obvious incentives, replacement of dialysate may be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.