ArticleBMC oral health2023
The effect of Er, Cr:YSGG laser debonding on the bond strength of two ceramic materials to dentin.
Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review on laser-assisted veneer debonding.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- Screening the optimal parameters for Er: YAG laser debonding of lithium disilicate veneers: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Outcome of Er, Cr:YSGG laser and antioxidant pretreatments on bonding quality to caries-induced dentin.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Er:YAG Laser Versus Conventional Surface Treatment of Lithium Disilicate: In Vitro Study.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
- Optimized Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Parameters for the Removal of Dental Ceramic Restorations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative evaluation of internal fit and marginal gap of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyether ether ketone materials - an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEvaluating the bond strength of two ceramic materials to dentin after Er,Cr:YSGG laser debonding. Would laser debonding affect the bond strength of ceramic to dentin? MATERIALS AND
methodsRecently extracted human molars were ground to expose dentin. Forty square shaped samples were prepared from CAD/CAM ceramic blocks. Samples were divided into two groups according to the type of ceramic material; group E: Lithium disilicate and group T: Ultra-translucent Zirconia (n = 20) Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the laser debonding effect (subgroup B: bonded samples, subgroup R: re-bonded samples after laser debonding). Ceramic samples were bonded to dentin using dual cure self-adhesive resin cement. Laser debonding of ceramic samples of subgroups R using Er, Cr:YSGG laser, were then re-bonded again to dentin surface with same resin cement. The Shear bond strength test using Universal testing machine was done. The failure mode was analyzed. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the mean bond strength and re-bond strength of two materials. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.
resultsTwo-Way ANOVA showed that ceramic type had a significant effect on the re-bond strength to dentin. The predominant failure mode was adhesive.
conclusionsLaser debonding of Lithium disilicate and Ultra translucent Zirconia decreased the re-bond strength to dentin. Deterioration in re-bond strength for Lithium disilicate ceramics was more pronounced than for Ultra translucent Zirconia. Clinical Relevance Deterioration in the bond strength between ceramics & dentin after laser debonding still needs improvement to allow its clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.