Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635630›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus YT and its cell-surface extract.

Chengran Guan, Wenjuan Zhang, Jianbo Su, Feng Li, Dawei Chen, Xia Chen, Yujun Huang, Ruixia Gu, Chenchen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Whole genome sequencing analysis and functional characterization of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HP-B1083.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial Activity ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chengran GuanKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China. crguan@yzu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6145-2949
Wenjuan ZhangKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jianbo SuKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Feng LiKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Dawei ChenKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xia ChenKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yujun HuangKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ruixia GuKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chenchen ZhangKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China. crguan@yzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria survived in the biofilm pose a serious threat to food safety and human health. It is urgent to find safe and effective methods to control the planktonic bacteria as well as the biofilm formation. Substances with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity found in lactic acid bacteria were mainly metabolites secreted in the cell-free supernatant. Previously, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus YT was isolated because its cell pellets displayed distinguished antibacterial activity under neutral conditions. This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of the L. rhamnosus YT cells and its crude cell-surface extract.

resultsThe antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells constantly increased with cells growth and reached the peak value after the cells grew into stationary phase. After cocultivation with the L. rhamnosus YT cells, the biofilm formation of B. subtilis and S. enterica was reduced. The antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells was varied along with various culture conditions (carbon sources, nitrogen sources, medium pH and cultural temperatures) and the antibacterial intensity (antibacterial activity per cell) was disproportional to the biomass. Furthermore, the cell-surface extract was isolated and displayed broad antimicrobial spectrum with a bacteriostatic mode of action. The antibiofilm activity of the extract was concentration-dependent. In addition, the extract was stable to physicochemical treatments (heat, pH and protease). The extract performed favorable emulsifying property which could reduce the water surface tension from 72.708 mN/m to 51.011 mN/m and the critical micelle concentration (CMC) value was 6.88 mg/mL. Besides, the extract was also able to emulsify hydrocarbon substrates with the emulsification, index (E24) ranged from 38.55% (for n-hexane) to 53.78% (for xylene). The E24 for xylene/extract emulsion was merely decreased by 5.77% after standing for 120 h. The main components of the extract were polysaccharide (684.63 μg/mL) and protein (120.79 μg/mL).

conclusionThe properties of the extract indicated that it might be a kind of biosurfactant. These data suggested that L. rhamnosus YT and the cell-surface extract could be used as an alternative antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria in food industry.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsHumansLacticaseibacillusPlant ExtractsXylenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsPlant ExtractsXylenesAntibacterialAntibiofilmCell-surface extractLactobacillus rhamnosus YTPhysicochemical properties

Identifiers

PMID36635630
PMCPMC9835366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.