Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635592›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023

[oregis-The German ophthalmological registry].

Jens Julian Storp, Christopher Dicke, Daniel Böhringer, Marc Schargus, Nicole Eter

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Julian StorpKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagkstr. 15, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. jens.storp@ukmuenster.de.
Christopher Dickeoregis, Projektmanagement, Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, München, Deutschland.
Daniel BöhringerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Marc SchargusKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Asklepios Klinik Nord-Heidberg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Nicole EterKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagkstr. 15, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
University Hospital Münster · DEDeutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical registries have shown their potential for medical research in different areas of healthcare in the past. The United States of America uses the well-known national ophthalmology registry Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®), on the basis of which insights into the ophthalmological care situation in the USA can be gained. Comparable projects do not currently exist in Germany. The oregis is the first disease-independent registry to collect comprehensive data in the field of ophthalmology in Germany for the purpose of healthcare research.

methodsThe oregis collects anonymized clinical patient information from all subfields of ophthalmology and makes it available for research purposes. Participating centers read their data into the registry free of charge and preferably in an automated fashion. Currently, the oregis parameter list contains about 600 parameters, of which about 100 are used in the current pilot phase.

resultsSince its initiation, the German ophthalmological registry oregis has compiled data on more than 1.75 million physician visits for more than 400,000 patients from German ophthalmologic centers. As of late 2022, more than 2.8 million visual acuity measurements and an equal number of intraocular pressure measurements have been recorded. DISCUSSION: The aim of the oregis project is to establish a nationwide ophthalmology databank that forms the basis for a learning healthcare system in the field of ophthalmology. With the help of continuous updating, oregis can also illustrate short-term innovations in ophthalmological care.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchOphthalmologyGermanyHealth Services ResearchHumansRegistriesUnited StatesData baseGermanyNationalPublic healthReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID36635592
OpenAlexW4315707080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.