Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635495›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Across Resource Settings: Latin American Perspectives.

Ronald Alvarado-Dyer, Sergio Aguilera, Randall M Chesnut, Walter Videtta, Danilo Fischer, Manuel Jibaja, Daniel A Godoy, Roxanna M Garcia, Fernando D Goldenberg, Christos Lazaridis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ronald Alvarado-DyerDivision of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Sergio AguileraNeurosurgery, Herminda Martin Hospital-Chillán Valparaíso University, Valparaíso, Chile.
Randall M ChesnutNeurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Walter VidettaIntensive Care, Posadas Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Danilo FischerIntensive Care, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Manuel JibajaIntensive Care, Hospital Eugenio Espejo, School of Medicine, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Daniel A GodoyIntensive Care, Sanatorio Pasteur, Catamarca, Argentina.
Roxanna M GarciaNeurosurgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fernando D GoldenbergDivision of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Christos LazaridisDivision of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. lazaridis@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-4830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a condition of increasing epidemiologic concern worldwide. Outcomes are worse as observed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries. Global targets are in place to address the surgical burden of disease. At the same time, most of the published literature and evidence on the clinical approach to sTBI comes from wealthy areas with an abundance of resources. The available paradigms, including the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference, Consensus Revised Imaging and Clinical Examination, and multimodality approaches, may fit differently depending on local resources, expertise, and sociocultural factors. A first step toward addressing heterogeneity in practice is to consider comparative effectiveness approaches that can capture actual practice patterns and record short-term and long-term outcomes of interest. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) decreases intracranial pressure burden and can be lifesaving. Nevertheless, completed randomized controlled trials took place within high-income settings, leaving important questions unanswered and making extrapolations to LMICs questionable. The concept of preemptive DC specifically to address limited neuromonitoring resources may warrant further study to establish a benefit/risk profile for the procedure and its role within local protocols of care.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDecompressive CraniectomyHumansIntracranial PressureLatin AmericaDecompressive craniectomyIntracranial pressureNeurosurgeryResourcesTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36635495
PMCPMC9836742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.