Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635438›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine learning enabled subgroup analysis with real-world data to inform clinical trial eligibility criteria design.

Jie Xu, Hao Zhang, Hansi Zhang, Jiang Bian, Fei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Xu *Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Hao Zhang *Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Hansi ZhangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. bianjiang@ufl.edu.
Fei WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. few2001@med.cornell.edu.
University of Florida Health · USWeill Cornell Medicine · USCornell University · US

Funding

TREM2 Genotype-Informed Drug Repurposing and Combination Therapy Design for Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG076448 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Feixiong Cheng, Li Gan · 2022 to 2026
$4.0M
Computational Drug Repurposing for AD/ADRD with Integrative Analysis of Real World Data and Biomedical KnowledgeR01AG076234 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jiang Bian, Fei Wang · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment using Machine Learning from Language and Behavior MarkersRF1AG072449 · NIA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, HIROKO HAYAMA, WANG, FEI · 2021 to 2023
$2.6M
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical TrialsR21AG068717 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$419k
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Cancer TrialsR21CA253394 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2021 to 2021
$392k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA253394NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076234NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076448NIA NIH HHS R21 AG068717NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG072449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overly restrictive eligibility criteria for clinical trials may limit the generalizability of the trial results to their target real-world patient populations. We developed a novel machine learning approach using large collections of real-world data (RWD) to better inform clinical trial eligibility criteria design. We extracted patients' clinical events from electronic health records (EHRs), which include demographics, diagnoses, and drugs, and assumed certain compositions of these clinical events within an individual's EHRs can determine the subphenotypes-homogeneous clusters of patients, where patients within each subgroup share similar clinical characteristics. We introduced an outcome-guided probabilistic model to identify those subphenotypes, such that the patients within the same subgroup not only share similar clinical characteristics but also at similar risk levels of encountering severe adverse events (SAEs). We evaluated our algorithm on two previously conducted clinical trials with EHRs from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Our model can clearly identify the patient subgroups who are more likely to suffer or not suffer from SAEs as subphenotypes in a transparent and interpretable way. Our approach identified a set of clinical topics and derived novel patient representations based on them. Each clinical topic represents a certain clinical event composition pattern learned from the patient EHRs. Tested on both trials, patient subgroup (#SAE=0) and patient subgroup (#SAE>0) can be well-separated by k-means clustering using the inferred topics. The inferred topics characterized as likely to align with the patient subgroup (#SAE>0) revealed meaningful combinations of clinical features and can provide data-driven recommendations for refining the exclusion criteria of clinical trials. The proposed supervised topic modeling approach can infer the clinical topics from the subphenotypes with or without SAEs. The potential rules for describing the patient subgroups with SAEs can be further derived to inform the design of clinical trial eligibility criteria.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningAlgorithmsClinical Trials as TopicEligibility DeterminationHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID36635438
PMCPMC9837131
OpenAlexW4315701814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.