ArticleScientific reports2023
Identification of host biomarkers from dried blood spots for monitoring treatment response in extrapulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dried Blood Spot for CXCL-10 and Tacrolimus: Integrated Non-Invasive Monitoring to Guide Personalized Treatment in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Endothelial, cytokine, and Th1/cellular host biomarkers discriminate complicated osteoarticular tuberculosis: a prospective single-center cohort study with ROC analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
- The role of long non-coding RNA HCP5 in ulcerative cutaneous tuberculosis therapy introduction.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics-based anti-tuberculous mechanism of traditional Chinese polyherbal preparation NiuBeiXiaoHe intermediates.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a lack of objective tools for monitoring treatment response in extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). This study aimed to explore the utility of inflammatory biomarkers from the dry blood spots (DBS) as a tool for monitoring treatment response in EPTB. In a prospective cohort study, 40 inflammatory biomarkers were investigated in DBS samples from 105 EPTB cases using a Luminex platform. The samples were taken before, and, at the end of the 2nd and 6th months of treatment. A total of 11 inflammatory host biomarkers changed significantly with treatment in all EPTB patients. CXCL9/MIG, CCL20, CCL23, CXCL10/IP-10, CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 significantly declined in our cohort of EPTB (48 TB pleuritis and 57 TB lymphadenitis) patients at both time points. A biosignature consisting of MIG, CCL23, and CXCL2, corresponded with the treatment response in 81% of patients in the 2nd month and 79% of patients at the end of treatment. MIG, CCL23, IP-10, and CXCL2 changed significantly with treatment in all patients including those showing partial clinical response at the 2nd month of treatment. The changes in the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in the DBS correspond with the treatment success and can be developed as a routine test in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.