Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635284›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5.

Hung Fu Tseng, Bradley K Ackerson, Katia J Bruxvoort, Lina S Sy, Julia E Tubert, Gina S Lee, Jennifer H Ku, Ana Florea, Yi Luo, Sijia Qiu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hung Fu TsengKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. Hung-Fu.X.Tseng@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-6534
Bradley K AckersonKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0816-7345
Katia J BruxvoortKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-2431
Lina S SyKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-9266
Julia E TubertKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Gina S LeeKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7554-9116
Jennifer H KuKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Ana FloreaKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Yi LuoKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-2470
Sijia QiuKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Soon Kyu ChoiKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Harpreet S TakharKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Michael AragonesKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Yamuna D PailaModerna, Inc., 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Scott ChaversModerna, Inc., 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Carla A TalaricoModerna, Inc., 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Lei QianKaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have reported reduced natural SARS-CoV-2 infection- and vaccine-induced neutralization against omicron BA.4/BA.5 compared with earlier omicron subvariants. This test-negative case-control study evaluates mRNA-1273 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection and hospitalization with omicron subvariants. The study includes 30,809 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 92,427 SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals aged ≥18 years tested during 1/1/2022-6/30/2022. While 3-dose VE against BA.1 infection is high and wanes slowly, VE against BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 infection is initially moderate to high (61.0%-90.6% 14-30 days post third dose) and wanes rapidly. The 4-dose VE against infection with BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4 ranges between 64.3%-75.7%, and is low (30.8%) against BA.5 14-30 days post fourth dose, disappearing beyond 90 days for all subvariants. The 3-dose VE against hospitalization for BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/BA.5 is 97.5%, 82.0%, and 72.4%, respectively; 4-dose VE against hospitalization for BA.4/BA.5 is 88.5%. Evaluation of the updated bivalent booster is warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesHumansVaccination2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273

Identifiers

PMID36635284
PMCPMC9836332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.