Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635065›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

Evaluation of Haplo-Paraspinal-Muscle-Preserving Technique to Prevent Postoperative Axial Pain in Cervical Laminoplasty.

XiaoLong Shen, Chen Xu, Ruizhe Wang, Zifan Zhang, Min Qi, Yizhi Zhang, Huiqiao Wu, Yang Liu, Huajiang Chen, Wen Yuan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of laminoplasty combined with C3 laminectomy for patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

XiaoLong Shen *Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chen Xu *Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ruizhe Wang *Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zifan Zhang *Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Min QiSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yizhi ZhangSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Huiqiao WuSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yang LiuSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Huajiang ChenSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China yuanwenspine@smmu.edu.cn chen.spine@163.com.
Wen YuanSpine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China yuanwenspine@smmu.edu.cn chen.spine@163.com.
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNAnkara Spine Center · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to assess the efficacy of a new haplo-paraspinal-muscle-preserving (HMP) laminoplasty technique in the treatment of cervical myelopathy.

methodsThe medical records of 68 patients diagnosed with multisegmental cervical myelopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 22 patients who underwent HMP laminoplasty were defined as the muscle-preserved group (MP), and 46 patients who underwent traditional open-door laminoplasty were enrolled and defined as the traditional open-door laminoplasty group (LP). Patient demographic data and surgical parameters like clinical and radiological parameters, operation duration, blood loss, and spinal canal expansion distance were compared.

resultsAverage surgical time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the MP group when compared with the LP group (

conclusionsThe HMP laminoplasty technique is relatively safe, effective, easier to perform, and better for lordosis maintenance and complication control compared with the traditional open-door technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although traditional open-door laminoplasty is an efficient approach in treating multisegmental cervical myelopathy, the complications could significantly affect the clinical outcome. Our new HMP laminoplasty technique has a lower complication rate and a better lordosis maintenance ability; therefore, it could be a better choice in treating multisegmental cervical myelopathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

axial paincervical myelopathylaminoplastyparaspinal muscle

Identifiers

PMID36635065
PMCPMC10165665
OpenAlexW4315709558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.