Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635056›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Use of the Woven EndoBridge Device for Sidewall Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A Rodriguez-Calienes, J Vivanco-Suarez, M Galecio-Castillo, C B Zevallos, M Farooqui, M Malaga, C Moran-Mariños, N F Fanning, O Algin, E A Samaniego and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative radial force measurements of Woven EndoBridge devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A Rodriguez-CalienesFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-8413-6954
J Vivanco-SuarezFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-5326-1907
M Galecio-CastilloFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-8107-9632
C B ZevallosFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-8715-240X
M FarooquiFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-3697-5697
M MalagaFrom the Departments of Neurology (A.R.-C., J.V.-S., M.G.-C., C.B.Z., M.F., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-6477-8423
C Moran-MariñosUnidad de Investigación en Bibliometría (C.M.-M.), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-0540
N F FanningDepartment of Neuroradiology (N.F.F.), Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-9591
O AlginDepartment of Radiology (O.A.), Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3877-8366
E A SamaniegoNeurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology (E.A.S., S.O.-G.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-2268
B PabonDepartment of Neurosurgery (B.P.), AngioTeam, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-4991
N MouchtourisDepartment of Neurological Surgery (N.M., P.J.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-9391
D J AltschulDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.J.A.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5130-1378
P JabbourDepartment of Neurological Surgery (N.M., P.J.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8965-2413
S Ortega-GutierrezNeurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology (E.A.S., S.O.-G.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa santy-ortega@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-1297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Woven EndoBridge device was originally approved to treat intracranial wide-neck saccular bifurcation aneurysms. Recent studies have suggested its use for the treatment of sidewall intracranial aneurysms with variable success. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge device for sidewall aneurysms using a meta-analysis of the literature. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review of all studies including patients treated with the Woven EndoBridge device for sidewall aneurysms from inception until May 2022 on Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Ten studies were selected, and 285 patients with 288 sidewall aneurysms were included. DATA ANALYSIS: A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions using a generalized linear mixed model was performed as appropriate. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I DATA SYNTHESIS: The adequate occlusion rate at last follow-up was 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%; I LIMITATIONS: Given the level of evidence, our results should be interpreted cautiously until confirmation from larger prospective studies is obtained.

conclusionsThe initial evidence evaluating the use of the Woven EndoBridge device for the treatment of wide-neck sidewall intracranial aneurysms has demonstrated high rates of adequate occlusion with low procedural complications. Our findings favor the consideration of the Woven EndoBridge device as an option for the treatment of sidewall aneurysms.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36635056
PMCPMC9891330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.