Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634965›Full record

ArticleClinical endoscopy2023

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up in a Western center.

Andreas Probst, Alanna Ebigbo, Stefan Eser, Carola Fleischmann, Tina Schaller, Bruno Märkl, Stefan Schiele, Bernd Geissler, Gernot Müller, Helmut Messmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas ProbstDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Alanna EbigboDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan EserDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Carola FleischmannDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Tina SchallerInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Bruno MärklInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan SchieleInstitute of Mathematics and Computational Statistics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Bernd GeisslerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Gernot MüllerInstitute of Mathematics and Computational Statistics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Helmut MessmannDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
University Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been established as a treatment modality for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Long-term follow-up data are lacking in Western countries. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survival in a Western center.

methodsPatients undergoing ESD for ESCC were included. The analysis was performed retrospectively using a prospectively collected database.

resultsR0 resection rate was 96.7% (59/61 lesions in 58 patients). Twenty-seven patients (46.6%) fulfilled the curative resection criteria (M1/M2) (group A), 11 patients (19.0%) had M3 lesions without lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (group B), and 20 patients (34.5%) had lesions with submucosal invasion or LVI (group C). Additional treatment was recommended after non-curative resection. It was not performed in 20/31 patients (64.5%), mainly because of comorbidities (75%). Twenty-nine out of 58 (50.0%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Death was related to ESCC in 17.2% (5/29) of patients. The disease-specific survival rate after curative resection was 100%. Overall survival rates after 5 years were 61.5%, 63.6% and 28.1% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The overall survival was significantly worse after non-curative resection (p=0.038).

conclusionNon-curative resection is frequent after ESD for ESCC in Western patients. The long-term prognosis is limited and mainly determined by comorbidity. Early diagnosis and pre-interventional assessments need to be improved.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophageal neoplasmsPrognosisSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36634965
PMCPMC9902687
OpenAlexW4315783165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.