ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2023
A Telephone Triage System for Patients Calling with Symptoms of a Posterior Vitreous Detachment.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Involving Patients in Developing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Retinal Detachment.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to develop a simple telephone questionnaire, without physical examination input, that predicts which patients calling with symptoms of a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) have a retinal tear (RT) or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD).
designProspective cohort (quality improvement) study.
participantsAll patients with symptoms consistent with a PVD calling a major academic ophthalmology department over a 4-month period in 2020 and who were seen on follow-up within 1.5 months (211 screened and 193 included).
methodsA comprehensive telephone questionnaire assessing for RT/RD risk factors was administered by telephone triage staff to all patients calling with symptoms of flashes, floaters, or curtain/veil in their vision. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors most predictive of having an RT/RD during the add-on visit. Risk factor odds ratios were used to develop an RT/RD risk score. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Development of a clinical risk score for having an RT/RD at the add-on visit after telephone triage.
resultsApproximately 55% of patients were previously established in the retina clinic, 26% were new to the department, 19% were previously established in the comprehensive clinic, and 7% had an RT/RD at the add-on visit. Out of 23 questions and 70 prespecified possible answers from the telephone questionnaire, the final clinical risk score for RT/RDs was derived from 7 questions and 15 possible answers. The simplified questionnaire can be administered quickly by telephone operators without any reference to physical examination or the patient's chart. The receive-operator curve for our final multivariable logistic regression and clinical risk score models have an area under the curve of > 0.90. Using a conservative clinical risk score, approximately 50% of all patients without an RT/RD can be safely seen nonurgently. Progressively higher scores can be used to determine relative urgency of an appointment.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to predict risk of an RT/RD in a patient calling with symptoms consistent with a PVD without reference to the patient's physical examination or chart. Our clinical risk scoring system can be used to determine urgency of an add-on appointment and increase the number of low-risk patients with symptomatic PVDs who are scheduled routinely. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.