Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634738›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2023

Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Interviews to Inform Measurement of Patient Reported Outcomes After CAR-T.

Idayat M Akinola, Rachel Cusatis, Marcelo C Pasquini, Bronwen E Shaw, Vamsi Bollu, Anand Dalal, Mimi Tesfaye, Kathryn E Flynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Promoting patient-centered care in CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancy: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Neurological complications of current and emerging CAR-T cell therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Idayat M AkinolaMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Rachel CusatisMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Marcelo C PasquiniMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Bronwen E ShawMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Vamsi BolluNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Anand DalalNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Mimi TesfayeNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Kathryn E FlynnMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: kflynn@mcw.edu.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Immuno-Oncology Translation Network (IOTN): Cellular Immunotherapy Data Resource (CIDR)U24CA233032 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI PASQUINI, MARCELO C. · 2018 to 2019
$9.0M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24 CA233032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicities after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy are well known, yet the patient experience during and after CAR-T therapy has not been well described outside of the trial setting. We explored the patient experience after CAR-T therapy to inform the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement approach for the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). We recruited (1) adult patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy 14 days to 6 months after receiving a commercial CAR T cell product who had agreed to be contacted by the CIBMTR, (2) caregivers of those patients, and (3) clinical experts in CAR-T therapy. Telephone interviews were conducted following a semistructured guide that included open-ended questions about symptoms and functioning. We conducted a systematic content analysis of each transcript using prespecified codes representing common domains of health, as well as open coding for emergent themes. Forty patients at 29 centers, 15 of their caregivers, and 15 experts from 9 centers participated, representing diversity with respect to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years in practice (experts). Patients, caregivers, and experts shared largely consistent impressions of the patient experience after CAR-T therapy. Commonly described themes included anxiety, cognitive dysfunction, depression, fatigue, pain, impaired physical function, gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulties, need for support, financial impact, hospitalization, communication with healthcare providers, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Limitations in patients' ability to participate in social roles and activities was the most prevalent theme, found in nearly all interviews. In the setting of CAR-T therapy, a multidimensional approach to PRO measurement is needed that includes physical, mental, and social health, as well as the financial impact of this novel treatment. High-quality existing PRO tools are available to measure these concepts. Results will inform the CIBMTR measurement of PROs after CAR-T therapy and may be applicable to other CAR-T studies that aim to represent patient experiences.

Indexed as

COVID-19Receptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAnxietyHumansPandemicsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReceptors, Chimeric AntigenChimeric antigen receptor T cell therapyPatient experiencePatient-reported outcomesQualitative

Identifiers

PMID36634738
PMCPMC10369368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.