Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634438›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2023

A Bayesian constitutive model selection framework for biaxial mechanical testing of planar soft tissues: Application to porcine aortic valves.

Ankush Aggarwal, Luke T Hudson, Devin W Laurence, Chung-Hao Lee, Sanjay Pant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankush AggarwalGlasgow Computational Engineering Centre, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, Scotland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ankush.aggarwal@glasgow.ac.uk.
Luke T HudsonBiomechanics and Biomaterials Design Laboratory, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, 73019, OK, United States of America.
Devin W LaurenceBiomechanics and Biomaterials Design Laboratory, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, 73019, OK, United States of America.
Chung-Hao LeeBiomechanics and Biomaterials Design Laboratory, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, 73019, OK, United States of America.
Sanjay PantFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, Wales, United Kingdom.

Funding

Improving outcomes in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Combining additive manufacturing, in-silico modeling, and shape memory polymersR01HL159475 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI Chung-Hao Lee · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of constitutive models have been developed for soft tissue mechanics. However, there is no established criterion to select a suitable model for a specific application. Although the model that best fits the experimental data can be deemed the most suitable model, this practice often can be insufficient given the inter-sample variability of experimental observations. Herein, we present a Bayesian approach to calculate the relative probabilities of constitutive models based on biaxial mechanical testing of tissue samples. Forty-six samples of porcine aortic valve tissue were tested using a biaxial stretching setup. For each sample, seven ratios of stresses along and perpendicular to the fiber direction were applied. The probabilities of eight invariant-based constitutive models were calculated based on the experimental data using the proposed model selection framework. The calculated probabilities showed that, out of the considered models and based on the information available through the utilized experimental dataset, the May-Newman model was the most probable model for the porcine aortic valve data. When the samples were further grouped into different cusp types, the May-Newman model remained the most probable for the left- and right-coronary cusps, whereas for non-coronary cusps two models were found to be equally probable: the Lee-Sacks model and the May-Newman model. This difference between cusp types was found to be associated with the first principal component analysis (PCA) mode, where this mode's amplitudes of the non-coronary and right-coronary cusps were found to be significantly different. Our results show that a PCA-based statistical model can capture significant variations in the mechanical properties of soft tissues. The presented framework is applicable to other tissue types, and has the potential to provide a structured and rational way of making simulations population-based.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveHeart Valve ProsthesisAnimalsBayes TheoremBiomechanical PhenomenaMechanical TestsModels, StatisticalStress, MechanicalSwineAortic valveBayesianBiomechanicsConstitutive modelModel selectionSoft-tissue

Identifiers

PMID36634438
PMCPMC10226148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.