ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2023
A Bayesian constitutive model selection framework for biaxial mechanical testing of planar soft tissues: Application to porcine aortic valves.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Automated data-driven discovery of material models based on symbolic regression: A case study on the human brain cortex.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- The biomechanics of wounds at physiologically relevant levels: Understanding skin's stress-shielding effect for the quantitative assessment of healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Bayesian Optimization-Based Inverse Finite Element Analysis for Atrioventricular Heart Valves.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Strain energy density as a Gaussian process and its utilization in stochastic finite element analysis: application to planar soft tissues.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of constitutive models have been developed for soft tissue mechanics. However, there is no established criterion to select a suitable model for a specific application. Although the model that best fits the experimental data can be deemed the most suitable model, this practice often can be insufficient given the inter-sample variability of experimental observations. Herein, we present a Bayesian approach to calculate the relative probabilities of constitutive models based on biaxial mechanical testing of tissue samples. Forty-six samples of porcine aortic valve tissue were tested using a biaxial stretching setup. For each sample, seven ratios of stresses along and perpendicular to the fiber direction were applied. The probabilities of eight invariant-based constitutive models were calculated based on the experimental data using the proposed model selection framework. The calculated probabilities showed that, out of the considered models and based on the information available through the utilized experimental dataset, the May-Newman model was the most probable model for the porcine aortic valve data. When the samples were further grouped into different cusp types, the May-Newman model remained the most probable for the left- and right-coronary cusps, whereas for non-coronary cusps two models were found to be equally probable: the Lee-Sacks model and the May-Newman model. This difference between cusp types was found to be associated with the first principal component analysis (PCA) mode, where this mode's amplitudes of the non-coronary and right-coronary cusps were found to be significantly different. Our results show that a PCA-based statistical model can capture significant variations in the mechanical properties of soft tissues. The presented framework is applicable to other tissue types, and has the potential to provide a structured and rational way of making simulations population-based.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.