Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634337›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2023

Optimal timing of a γH2AX analysis to predict cellular lethal damage in cultured tumor cell lines after exposure to diagnostic and therapeutic radiation doses.

Seiya Takano, Yuta Shibamoto, Zhen Wang, Takuhito Kondo, Shingo Hashimoto, Tatsuya Kawai, Akio Hiwatashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. NClinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seiya TakanoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Yuta ShibamotoNarita Memorial Proton Center, 78 Shirakawa-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8021, Japan.
Zhen WangGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Takuhito KondoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Shingo HashimotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusaku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.
Tatsuya KawaiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Akio HiwatashiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.

Funding

JSPS 18K07725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) is a sensitive biomarker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To assess the adverse effects of low-dose radiation (<50 mGy), γH2AX levels have typically been measured in human lymphocytes within 30 min of computed tomography (CT) examinations. However, in the presence of DSB repair, it remains unclear whether γH2AX levels within 30 min of irradiation completely reflect biological effects. Therefore, we investigated the optimal timing of a γH2AX analysis to predict the cell-surviving fraction (SF). Three tumor cell lines were irradiated at different X-ray doses (10-4000 mGy), and the relationships between SF and relative γH2AX levels were investigated 15 min and 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after irradiation. Data were analyzed for high-dose (0-4000 mGy) and low-dose (0-500 mGy) ranges. Correlations were observed between SF and the relative number of γH2AX foci/nucleus at 12 h only (R2 = 0.68, P = 0.001 after high doses; R2 = 0.37, P = 0.016 after low doses). The relative intensity of γH2AX correlated with SF 15 min to 12 h after high doses and 2 to 12 h after low doses, with the maximum R2 values being observed 2 h after high doses (R2 = 0.89, P < 0.001) and 12 h after low doses (R2 = 0.65, P < 0.001). Collectively, cellular lethal damage in tumor cells was more accurately estimated with residual DSBs 12 h after low-dose (10-500 mGy) irradiation. These results may contribute to determination of the optimal timing of biodosimetric analyses using γH2AX in future studies.

Indexed as

DNA RepairHistonesCell Line, TumorDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansHistonesclonogenic cell survivalDNA repairdouble-strand break (DSB)gammaH2AX (γH2AX)low-dose radiation

Identifiers

PMID36634337
PMCPMC10036098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.