Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634270›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2023

Deep Learning to Analyze Sliding Drops.

Sajjad Shumaly, Fahimeh Darvish, Xiaomei Li, Alexander Saal, Chirag Hinduja, Werner Steffen, Oleksandra Kukharenko, Hans-Jürgen Butt, Rüdiger Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Salt Water Drops Slide Faster: Ionic Modulation of Drop Friction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Surfactants Screen Slide Electrification.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  4. Furmidge Equation Revisited.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sajjad ShumalyMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
Fahimeh DarvishMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
Xiaomei LiMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
Alexander SaalMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
Chirag HindujaMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-5750
Werner SteffenMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6540-0660
Oleksandra KukharenkoMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3285-1403
Hans-Jürgen ButtMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-2618
Rüdiger BergerMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-0675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-of-the-art contact angle measurements usually involve image analysis of sessile drops. The drops are symmetric and images can be taken at high resolution. The analysis of videos of drops sliding down a tilted plate is hampered due to the low resolution of the cutout area where the drop is visible. The challenge is to analyze all video images automatically, while the drops are not symmetric anymore and contact angles change while sliding down the tilted plate. To increase the accuracy of contact angles, we present a 4-segment super-resolution optimized-fitting (4S-SROF) method. We developed a deep learning-based super-resolution model with an upscale ratio of 3; i.e., the trained model is able to enlarge drop images 9 times accurately (PSNR = 36.39). In addition, a systematic experiment using synthetic images was conducted to determine the best parameters for polynomial fitting of contact angles. Our method improved the accuracy by 21% for contact angles lower than 90° and by 33% for contact angles higher than 90°.

Identifiers

PMID36634270
PMCPMC9878717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.