Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634135›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

How acidic amino acid residues facilitate DNA target site selection.

Kazi Amirul Hossain, Mateusz Kogut, Joanna Słabońska, Subrahmanyam Sappati, Miłosz Wieczór, Jacek Czub

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Flexibility in PAM Recognition Expands DNA Targeting in xCas9.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. ASR gene family: a case of tandem-drive evolution.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multimodal interactions drive chromatin phase separation and compaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kazi Amirul HossainDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1149-964X
Mateusz KogutDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-0863
Joanna SłabońskaDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.
Subrahmanyam SappatiDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.
Miłosz WieczórDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.
Jacek CzubDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland.
Gdańsk University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the negative charge of the DNA backbone, acidic residues (Asp/Glu) commonly participate in the base readout, with a strong preference for cytosine. In fact, in the solved DNA/protein structures, cytosine is recognized almost exclusively by Asp/Glu through a direct hydrogen bond, while at the same time, adenine, regardless of its amino group, shows no propensity for Asp/Glu. Here, we analyzed the contribution of Asp/Glu to sequence-specific DNA binding using classical and ab initio simulations of selected transcription factors and found that it is governed by a fine balance between the repulsion from backbone phosphates and attractive interactions with cytosine. Specifically, Asp/Glu lower the affinity for noncytosine sites and thus act as negative selectors preventing off-target binding. At cytosine-containing sites, the favorable contribution does not merely rely on the formation of a single H-bond but usually requires the presence of positive potential generated by multiple cytosines, consistently with the observed excess of cytosine in the target sites. Finally, we show that the preference of Asp/Glu for cytosine over adenine is a result of the repulsion from the adenine imidazole ring and a tendency of purine-purine dinucleotides to adopt the BII conformation.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, AcidicDNAAdenineCytosinePurinesAdenineAmino Acids, AcidicCytosineDNAPurinesDNA base preferenceDNA–protein recognitionMD simulationstranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID36634135
PMCPMC9934023
OpenAlexW4315754647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.