Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36634110›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The effects of hearing protection devices on spatial awareness in complex listening environments.

Hillary A Snapp, Barbara Millet, Natasha Schaefer-Solle, Suhrud M Rajguru, Sebastian A Ausili

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06729632 (Non-Invasive System to Deliver Therapeutic Hypothermia for Protection Against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06729632 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Non-Invasive System to Deliver Therapeutic Hypothermia for Protection Against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorRestorear Devices LLCRan2024 to 2027Enrolled116ConditionsNoise Exposure, Noise-induced Hearing Loss, Noise, Adverse EffectArmsCold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Perceptions of Hearing Health and Protection among Florida Firefighters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hillary A SnappDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2000-5357
Barbara MilletDepartment of Interactive Media, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Natasha Schaefer-SolleDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Suhrud M RajguruDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Sebastian A AusiliDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America.
University of Miami · US

Funding

Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002736 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2018 to 2022
$23.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing protection devices (HPDs) remain the first line of defense against hazardous noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Despite the increased awareness of NIHL as a major occupational health hazard, implementation of effective hearing protection interventions remains challenging in at-risk occupational groups including those in public safety that provide fire, emergency medical, or law enforcement services. A reduction of situational awareness has been reported as a primary barrier to including HPDs as routine personal protective equipment. This study examined the effects of hearing protection and simulated NIHL on spatial awareness in ten normal hearing subjects. In a sound-attenuating booth and using a head-orientation tracker, speech intelligibility and localization accuracy were collected from these subjects under multiple listening conditions. Results demonstrate that the use of HPDs disrupts spatial hearing as expected, specifically localization performance and monitoring of speech signals. There was a significant interaction between hemifield and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with speech intelligibility significantly affected when signals were presented from behind at reduced SNR. Results also suggest greater spatial hearing disruption using over-the-ear HPDs when compared to the removal of high frequency cues typically associated with NIHL through low-pass filtering. These results are consistent with reduced situational awareness as a self-reported barrier to routine HPD use, and was evidenced in our study by decreased ability to make accurate decisions about source location in a controlled dual-task localization experiment.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedNoise, OccupationalAuditory PerceptionCognitionCuesEar Protective DevicesHearingHumans

Identifiers

PMID36634110
PMCPMC9836314
OpenAlexW4315708866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.