Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633874›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2023

Evaluation of Multiple Machine Learning Models for Predicting Number of Anti-VEGF Injections in the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials (CATT).

Rajat S Chandra, Gui-Shuang Ying

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Retinal Diseases.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajat S ChandraPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gui-Shuang YingCenter for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To apply machine learning models for predicting the number of pro re nata (PRN) injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in two years in the Comparison of AMD (age-related macular degeneration) Treatments Trials. Methods: The data from 493 eligible participants randomized to PRN treatment of ranibizumab or bevacizumab were used for training (n = 393) machine learning models including support-vector machine (SVM), random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models. Model performances of prediction using clinical and image data from baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12 were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting few (≤8) or many (≥19) injections, by R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting the total number of injections in two years. The best model was selected for final validation on a test dataset (n = 100). Results: Using training data up to week 12, the models achieved AUCs of 0.79-0.82 and 0.79-0.81 for predicting few and many injections, respectively, with R2 of 0.34-0.36 (MAE = 4.45-4.58 injections) for predicting total injections in two years from cross-validation. In final validation on the test dataset, the SVM model had AUCs of 0.77 and 0.82 for predicting few and many injections, respectively, with R2 of 0.44 (MAE = 3.92 injections). Important features included fluid in optical coherence tomography, lesion characteristics, and treatment trajectory in the first three months. Conclusions: Machine learning models using loading dose phase data have the potential to predict two-year anti-VEGF demand for nAMD and quantify feature importance for these predictions. Translational Relevance: Prediction of anti-VEGF injections using machine learning models from readily available data, after further validation on independent datasets, has the potential to help optimize treatment protocols and outcomes for nAMD patients in an individualized manner.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsMacular DegenerationChild, PreschoolHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMachine LearningRanibizumabAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID36633874
PMCPMC9840444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.