Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2023
Evaluation of Multiple Machine Learning Models for Predicting Number of Anti-VEGF Injections in the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials (CATT).
Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning.Ophthalmology. Retina · 2024Trial
- Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- The Central Role of Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Retinopathy: Advances in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence based prediction of first recurrence in neovascular age related macular degeneration with validation by 19 experts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ophthalmic drug discovery and development using artificial intelligence and digital health technologies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- AI-Based Response Classification After Anti-VEGF Loading in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacoproteomics in the development of personalised medicine in Age-related Macular Degeneration (PHARPRO-AMD) study protocol.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-driven prediction of cycloplegic refractive error in Chinese children.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Session-by-Session Prediction of Anti-Endothelial Growth Factor Injection Needs in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Optical-Coherence-Tomography-Derived Features and Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review of Guideline Recommendations for Optimal Anti-VEGF Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Retinal Diseases.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error and Myopia Status Based on Non-Cycloplegic Data in Chinese Students.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Novel Approaches for Early Detection of Retinal Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration: state of the art and recent updates.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Preliminary analysis of predicting the first recurrence in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration using deep learning.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Age-Related Scattered Hypofluorescent Spots as an Adverse Prognostic Factor for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To apply machine learning models for predicting the number of pro re nata (PRN) injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in two years in the Comparison of AMD (age-related macular degeneration) Treatments Trials. Methods: The data from 493 eligible participants randomized to PRN treatment of ranibizumab or bevacizumab were used for training (n = 393) machine learning models including support-vector machine (SVM), random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models. Model performances of prediction using clinical and image data from baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12 were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting few (≤8) or many (≥19) injections, by R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting the total number of injections in two years. The best model was selected for final validation on a test dataset (n = 100). Results: Using training data up to week 12, the models achieved AUCs of 0.79-0.82 and 0.79-0.81 for predicting few and many injections, respectively, with R2 of 0.34-0.36 (MAE = 4.45-4.58 injections) for predicting total injections in two years from cross-validation. In final validation on the test dataset, the SVM model had AUCs of 0.77 and 0.82 for predicting few and many injections, respectively, with R2 of 0.44 (MAE = 3.92 injections). Important features included fluid in optical coherence tomography, lesion characteristics, and treatment trajectory in the first three months. Conclusions: Machine learning models using loading dose phase data have the potential to predict two-year anti-VEGF demand for nAMD and quantify feature importance for these predictions. Translational Relevance: Prediction of anti-VEGF injections using machine learning models from readily available data, after further validation on independent datasets, has the potential to help optimize treatment protocols and outcomes for nAMD patients in an individualized manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.