Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633864›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2023

Asymmetrical nasal high flow ventilation improves clearance of CO

Stanislav Tatkov, Monique Rees, Anton Gulley, Lotte G T van den Heuij, Georg Nilius

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06204276 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Physiologic Effects of Asymmetrical Versus Conventional High-flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Respiratory Failure. A Randomized Crossover Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSiriraj HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsAcute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureArmsExperimental: Asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula, Active comparator: Conventional high-flow nasal cannula
NCT06301035 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Asymmetric High-flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Standard HFNC in Post Extubation High-risk Group: A Prospective, Single-center, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsAcute Respiratory FailureArmsAsymmetric High flow nasal cannula, Standard(symmetric) High flow nasal cannula
NCT06674629 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of an Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula Interface on End-Expiratory Lung Impedance

TypeobservationalSponsorArgentinian Intensive Care SocietyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled17ConditionsEnd-Expiratory Lung Impedance, Respiratory Rate, Diaphragm Thickness Fraction, Diaphragm ExcursionArmsHigh flow oxygen therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanislav TatkovFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-0481
Monique ReesFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.
Anton GulleyFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.
Lotte G T van den HeuijFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.
Georg NiliusEvang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte GmbH, Essen, Germany.
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (New Zealand) · NZWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive airway pressure that dynamically changes with breathing, and clearance of anatomical dead space are the key mechanisms of noninvasive respiratory support with nasal high flow (NHF). Pressure mainly depends on flow rate and nare occlusion. The hypothesis is that an increase in asymmetrical occlusion of the nares leads to an improvement in dead-space clearance resulting in a reduction in re-breathing. Clearance was investigated with volumetric capnography in an adult upper-airway model, which was ventilated by a lung simulator with entrained carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxidePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultHumansKineticsLungRespirationCarbon Dioxideasymmetricaldead spacenasal cannulanasal high flowrespiratory support

Identifiers

PMID36633864
PMCPMC9886347
OpenAlexW4315706455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.