Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633860›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2023

The impact of growth at elevated [CO2] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars.

Shellie Wall, James Cockram, Silvere Vialet-Chabrand, Jeroen Van Rie, Alexander Gallé, Tracy Lawson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Future heatwave conditions inhibit COThe New phytologist · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Elevated [COPhysiologia plantarum
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shellie WallSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7238-7679
James CockramNIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-6463
Silvere Vialet-ChabrandSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-2825
Jeroen Van RieBASF Belgium Coordination Center CommV-Innovation Center Gent, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 101, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-962X
Alexander GalléBASF Belgium Coordination Center CommV-Innovation Center Gent, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 101, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6927-7911
Tracy LawsonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4073-7221
University of Essex · GBGhent University · BENational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1775930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of plants to respond to changes in the environment is crucial to their survival and reproductive success. The impact of increasing the atmospheric CO2 concentration (a[CO2]), mediated by behavioral and developmental responses of stomata, on crop performance remains a concern under all climate change scenarios, with potential impacts on future food security. To identify possible beneficial traits that could be exploited for future breeding, phenotypic variation in morphological traits including stomatal size and density, as well as physiological responses and, critically, the effect of growth [CO2] on these traits, was assessed in six wheat relative accessions (including Aegilops tauschii, Triticum turgidum ssp. Dicoccoides, and T. turgidum ssp. dicoccon) and five elite bread wheat T. aestivum cultivars. Exploiting a range of different species and ploidy, we identified key differences in photosynthetic capacity between elite hexaploid wheat and wheat relatives. We also report differences in the speed of stomatal responses which were found to be faster in wheat relatives than in elite cultivars, a trait that could be useful for enhanced photosynthetic carbon gain and water use efficiency. Furthermore, these traits do not all appear to be influenced by elevated [CO2], and determining the underlying genetics will be critical for future breeding programmes.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideTriticumPhenotypePhotosynthesisPlant BreedingCarbon DioxideBread wheatnet CO2 assimilation rate (A)stomatal conductance (gs)stomatal densityTriticum aestivum LTriticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoidesTriticum turgidum ssp. dicoccon)wheat relatives (Aegilops tauschii

Identifiers

PMID36633860
PMCPMC10134898
OpenAlexW4315709045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.