Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633797›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2024

Far Transfer Effects of Trainings on Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.

Clara Bombonato, Benedetta Del Lucchese, Costanza Ruffini, Maria Chiara Di Lieto, Paola Brovedani, Giuseppina Sgandurra, Giovanni Cioni, Chiara Pecini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06288971 (Personalized Innovative Intervention Pathways to Promote Executive Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06288971 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Personalized Innovative Intervention Pathways to Promote Executive Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsExecutive Functions in Cerebral PalsyArmsSelf-adaption web-based software for the rehabilitation of EF and visuo-spatial abilities, Tele-rehabilitation of EF and specific cognitive processes underlying academic skills, Game-based tools for the rehabilitation of EF and motor planning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Executive Functions and Public Health: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clara Bombonato *Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
Benedetta Del Lucchese *Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
Costanza RuffiniDepartment of Education, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Languages, Florence, Italy.
Maria Chiara Di LietoDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
Paola BrovedaniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppina SgandurraDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy. giuseppina.sgandurra@fsm.unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0842-4268
Giovanni CioniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara PeciniDepartment of Education, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Languages, Florence, Italy.
Fondazione Stella Maris · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris 5x1000Ministero della Salute RC 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive Functions are a set of interrelated, top-down processes essential for adaptive goal-directed behaviour, frequently impaired across different neurodevelopmental disorders with variable degrees of severity. Many executive-function-training studies in children with neurodevelopmental disorders have focused on near effects, investigating post-treatment improvements on directly trained processes, while enhancements of skills not directly trained, defined as far effects, are less considered, albeit these could be extremely relevant for reducing the negative impact of a disorder's core symptomatology. This systematic review and metanalysis aims to investigate the far effect outcomes after EF training in children with different types of neurodevelopmental disorders. 17 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, while 15 studies were selected in the metanalysis. An overall statistically significant effect size was found in the majority of far effect outcome measures considered in the studies. In particular, trainings on executive functions determine significant far effects on daily life functioning (0.46, 95% CI: [0.05-0.87]) and clinical symptoms (0.33, 95% CI: [0.15-0.51]). Despite a high variability of the results, intensity, frequency and the laboratory/life contexts dimension seem to be the most influential variables in determining far effects. This systematic review and metanalysis highlights the need to measure far effects of executive function training in neurodevelopmental disorders, selecting treatments not only on directly targeted processes, but also according to far impacts on the functional weakness of the disorder.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionNeurodevelopmental DisordersChildHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareChildrenExecutive functionsFar effectNeurodevelopmental disorders

Identifiers

PMID36633797
PMCPMC10920464
OpenAlexW4315651667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.