Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633763›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2023

Role of Visit Modality in the HIV-Related No-Shows During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.

Maira Sohail, Dustin Long, Emma Kay, Emily B Levitan, D Scott Batey, Harriette Reed-Pickens, Aadia Rana, Alyssa Carodine, Christa Nevin, Seqouya Eady and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maira SohailCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Dustin LongCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Emma KayCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Emily B LevitanCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
D Scott BateyCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Harriette Reed-PickensCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Aadia RanaCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Alyssa CarodineCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Christa NevinUAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1917 Clinic, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Seqouya EadyUAB Family Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jitesh ParmarThrive, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Kelly TurnerHealth Services Center, Anniston, AL, USA.
Ifeanyi OrakwueMedical Advocacy and Outreach (MAO), Montgomery, AL, USA.
Theresa MillerUniversity of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Tracy WynneUnity Wellness Center, Opelika, AL, USA.
Michael MugaveroCenter for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. mmugavero@uabmc.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USHealth Services Center · USSt. Vincent's Birmingham · USThrive · USTulane University · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

CDC HHS PS18-1802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid expansion of telehealth as part of healthcare delivery. This study compared HIV-related no-shows by visit type (in-person; video; telephone) during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-September 2021) from the Data for Care Alabama project. Using all primary care provider visits, each visit's outcome was categorized as no-show or arrived. A logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations accounting for repeat measures in individuals and within sites calculated odds ratios (OR) and their accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI) for no-shows by visit modality. The multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In-person versus telephone visits [OR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.48-1.82)] and in-person versus video visits [OR (95% CI) 1.53 (1.25-1.85)] had higher odds of being a no-show. In-person versus telephone and video no-shows were significantly higher. This may suggest success of telehealth visits as a method for HIV care delivery even beyond COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsTelemedicineAlabamaHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesHIVNo showsRetention in careTelehealthVisit modality

Identifiers

PMID36633763
PMCPMC9838273
OpenAlexW4315702585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.