ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2023
Safety and efficacy of mavacamten for treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Myosin inhibitors for treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Cardiac myosin inhibitors for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- What are the best clinical management strategies for cardiomyopathy? an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Practice of whole-course pharmaceutical care: a case in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a review of the pharmacist's role.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Special Focus on Mavacamten and Its Future in Cardiology.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of mavacamten for the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Advancements in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of Mavacamten for symptomatic Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - an updated Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Review
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of mavacamten in healthy Chinese participants with different CYP2C19 phenotypes.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of mavacamten in treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Future science OA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMavacamten, an allosteric myosin inhibitor, is considered to be a promising drug for the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This meta-analysis aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of mavacamten in HCM patients. MAIN BODY: A total number of 539 patients were enrolled in four randomized clinical trials. The mean age of patients was 57.9 years and was followed for 29.3 weeks. Pooled analysis showed a significant improvement in clinical response (Log OR = 0.65; p = 0.01) and the number of patients with a reduction of ≥ 1 NYHA function class (Log OR = 0.64, p = 0.00). It was found that mavacamten did not significantly affect the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (SMD = 0.43, p = 0.08), peak oxygen uptake (PVO
conclusionsMavacamten proved to be effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of HCM. Mavacamten improved the signs and symptoms of HOCM and decreased EF in these patients without serious adverse events in the clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.