Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633667›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Impact of keratoprosthesis implantation on retinal and visual pathway function assessed by electrophysiological testing.

Luzia Diegues Silva, Adriana Berezovsky, Solange Rios Salomão, Nívea Nunes Ferraz, Carina Verna, Tarciana de Souza Soares, Lauro Augusto de Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luzia Diegues SilvaDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana BerezovskyDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Solange Rios SalomãoDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nívea Nunes FerrazDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carina VernaDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tarciana de Souza SoaresDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lauro Augusto de OliveiraDepartamento de Oftalmologia E Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 806, SP, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil. laopadilha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-9342

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior PNPD 2374/2011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis (BI-Kpro) implantation on retinal and visual pathway function, respectively, assessed by full-field electroretinography (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEPs).

methodsThis is a prospective interventional longitudinal study, and patients with BI-Kpro implantation were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. ERG, flash, and pattern-reversal VEPs (15' and 60' checks) along with visual acuity (VA) were performed.

resultsA total of 13 patients (24 to 88 years of age) were included. Mean baseline VA (logMAR) improved from 2.30 to 1.04 at 3 months and to 1.00 at 12 months. Flash VEPs were normal in 6 (46%) patients and in 10 (77%) patients at the 12-month follow-up. PVEP was non-detectable in all patients preoperatively for both check sizes. For 15' check size, 6 (46%) patients showed responses after 3 and 12 months except for 1 patient with normal responses at 12 months with the remaining non-detectable. For 60' checks, 11 (85%) patients had responses 3 months after surgery with only 9 (70%) showing responses at 12 months. Abnormal full-field ERGs were found in all patients preoperatively. Amplitude improvement was found in 10 (77%) patients from baseline to 3 months and in 8 (62%) patients from the 3- to the 12-month follow-up.

conclusionsIn this small cohort of patients with BI-Kpro implantation, a remarkable improvement on visual function quantitatively assessed by electrophysiological testing was found in the majority of cases. Visual electrophysiological testing can contribute to objectively assess functional outcomes in this population.

Indexed as

CorneaCorneal DiseasesEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesProstheses and ImplantsVisual PathwaysElectrophysiology testsFull-field electroretinography (ERG)KeratoprosthesisVisually evoked potentials (VEP)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.