Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633614›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Low-count whole-body PET/MRI restoration: an evaluation of dose reduction spectrum and five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models.

Yan-Ran Joyce Wang, Pengcheng Wang, Lisa Christine Adams, Natasha Diba Sheybani, Liangqiong Qu, Amir Hossein Sarrami, Ashok Joseph Theruvath, Sergios Gatidis, Tina Ho, Quan Zhou and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Cancer Imaging.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yan-Ran Joyce WangDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA. wangyanran100@gmail.com.
Pengcheng WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Lisa Christine AdamsDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Natasha Diba SheybaniDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Liangqiong QuDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Amir Hossein SarramiDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Ashok Joseph TheruvathDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Sergios GatidisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tina HoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Quan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Allison PribnowDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Oncology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Avnesh S ThakorDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Oncology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Daniel RubinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Heike E Daldrup-LinkDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 725 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA. heiked@stanford.edu.

Funding

Advanced Imaging Tools to Assess Cancer Therapeutics in Pediatric PatientsR01CA269231 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Heike Elizabeth Daldrup-Link · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269231NCI NIH HHS R01CA269231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide a holistic and complete comparison of the five most advanced AI models in the augmentation of low-dose

methodsIn this multicenter study, five AI models were investigated for restoring low-count whole-body PET/MRI, covering convolutional benchmarks - U-Net, enhanced deep super-resolution network (EDSR), generative adversarial network (GAN) - and the most cutting-edge image reconstruction transformer models in computer vision to date - Swin transformer image restoration network (SwinIR) and EDSR-ViT (vision transformer). The models were evaluated against six groups of count levels representing the simulated 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 1% (extremely ultra-low-count) of the clinical standard 3 MBq/kg

resultsFor low-count PET restoration on the primary cohort, the mean structural similarity index (SSIM) scores for dose 6.25% were 0.898 (95% CI, 0.887-0.910) for EDSR, 0.893 (0.881-0.905) for EDSR-ViT, 0.873 (0.859-0.887) for GAN, 0.885 (0.873-0.898) for U-Net, and 0.910 (0.900-0.920) for SwinIR. In continuation, SwinIR and U-Net's performances were also discreetly evaluated at each simulated radiotracer dose levels. Using the primary Stanford cohort, the mean diagnostic image quality (DIQ; 5-point Likert scale) scores of SwinIR restoration were 5 (SD, 0) for dose 75%, 4.50 (0.535) for dose 50%, 3.75 (0.463) for dose 25%, 3.25 (0.463) for dose 12.5%, 4 (0.926) for dose 6.25%, and 2.5 (0.534) for dose 1%.

conclusionCompared to low-count PET images, with near-to or nondiagnostic images at higher dose reduction levels (up to 6.25%), both SwinIR and U-Net significantly improve the diagnostic quality of PET images. A radiotracer dose reduction to 1% of the current clinical standard radiotracer dose is out of scope for current AI techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFluorodeoxyglucose F18Drug TaperingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18CNNDeep learningPET restorationTransformer modelWhole-body PET imaging

Identifiers

PMID36633614
PMCPMC10387227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.