Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633552›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol review2023

A narrative review of outcome measures used in drug and alcohol inpatient withdrawal treatment research.

Jing Wang, Frank P Deane, Peter J Kelly, Laura Robinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing WangSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-5682
Frank P DeaneSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Peter J KellySchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-1865
Laura RobinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-475X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issuesAssessing drug and alcohol inpatient withdrawal treatment programs is important, as these represent a first step of treatment among people with alcohol and drug problems. However, there are many ways of measuring outcomes making it difficult for service providers to decide which domains and methods to use. This narrative review aims to clarify frequencies of the domains and methods used to assess withdrawal treatment outcomes. APPROACH: We reviewed published studies that examined outcomes of inpatient drug and alcohol withdrawal treatment. The types of outcome measures used and the frequency of use were summarised. KEY

findingsThe review showed that assessment of withdrawal treatment outcomes goes beyond traditional abstinence measures. Outcomes mainly focus on biological and psychological outcomes, with social outcomes rarely measured. Even within outcome domains (e.g., cravings), there were many assessment methods. IMPLICATIONS: The review provides service providers with an outline of common outcome domains and measures. Given the importance of social functioning to recovery from alcohol and drug problems, greater emphasis on such measures is desirable. Future research could develop greater consensus on outcome measures for use in withdrawal management services to facilitate clarity around factors associated with treatment success.

conclusionOutcome assessment in withdrawal treatment goes beyond abstinence to include holistic measurement of biological, psychological and some social outcomes; but more work needs to be done to cohere the different assessment methods and broaden the scope to include social functioning.

Indexed as

AlcoholismSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeHumansInpatientsOutcome Assessment, Health CareTreatment Outcomedrug and alcohol useinpatient withdrawal treatmentoutcome assessmentwithdrawal treatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36633552
PMCPMC10108086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.