Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633498›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

The effects of a mobile app-delivered intervention in people with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Pablo Rodríguez Sánchez-Laulhé, Ángela Biscarri-Carbonero, Alejandro Suero-Pineda, Luis G Luque-Romero, Francisco J Barrero García, Jesús Blanquero, Alberto M Heredia-Rizo

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo Rodríguez Sánchez-LaulhéDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain - pablorodriguez@healthinn.es.
Ángela Biscarri-CarboneroResearch Unit, Aljarafe-Sevilla North Health District, Andalusian Health Service, Seville, Spain.
Alejandro Suero-PinedaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Luis G Luque-RomeroResearch Unit, Aljarafe-Sevilla North Health District, Andalusian Health Service, Seville, Spain.
Francisco J Barrero GarcíaResearch Unit, Aljarafe-Sevilla North Health District, Andalusian Health Service, Seville, Spain.
Jesús BlanqueroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Alberto M Heredia-RizoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESAndalusian Health Service · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise therapy, self-management and education are recommended interventions for hand osteoarthritis (OA), but new delivery systems are needed to solve lack of adherence.

aimTo determine the effects on hand function and pain related measures of a mobile app-delivered intervention, compared with usual care, in patients with symptomatic hand OA.

designA pragmatic, multicenter, two-group parallel randomized controlled trial.

settingCommunity health centers in rural southern Spain. POPULATION: Eighty-three participants with unilateral or bilateral symptomatic hand OA were proposed to participate, and finally 74 were included and randomized.

methodsParticipants received a home multimodal treatment (exercise, education, and self-management recommendations) with the CareHand mobile app or usual care (written exercises) over 12 weeks. Monthly telephone calls were performed to monitor adherence. The primary outcome was hand physical function (Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index, AUSCAN) at 3- and 6-months. Secondary measures included hand pain intensity and morning stiffness, upper limb function, hand dexterity, and grip and pinch strength.

resultsThe CareHand group showed significant within-group changes in hand function at 6-months (-3.0, 95% CI -5.1 to -0.9 vs. usual care: -0.9, 95% CI -3.3 to 1.5). Neither group showed improvements in hand function at 3-months (CareHand: -1.5, 95% CI -3.1 to 0.1; usual care: -0.5, 95% CI -2.7 to 1.7). For the secondary outcomes, the CareHand group showed better results on upper limb function both at 3- and 6-months, and on pain both at 1- and 3-months compared to usual care group. Linear regression models indicated that baseline scores of pain intensity, hand status, and upper limb function were associated with a greater improvement in hand pain and physical function.

conclusionsA mobile app-delivered intervention is effective for improving hand function, and better than usual care for upper limb function and pain. Further research is warranted to understand the impact of mobile health (mHealth) in people with hand OA. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: mHealth interventions are a feasible and secure multimodal delivery approach in older adults with hand OA in rural primary care setting. Baseline pain and upper limb function might predict functional hand outcomes.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsOsteoarthritisAgedAustraliaCanadaExercise TherapyHumansPain

Identifiers

PMID36633498
PMCPMC10035439
OpenAlexW4315703178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.