Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633269›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2023

Digest: Multiple selective pressures drive color diversity in moths.

Linnea L Lungstrom, Zachary Fedder

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linnea L LungstromCommittee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Zachary FedderDepartment of Biology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
University of Chicago · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How are color polymorphisms maintained within populations? De Pasqual et al. (2022) showed that female wood tiger moths (Arctia plantaginis) that were heterozygous for a wing color gene had higher fertility, hatching success, and offspring survival. These findings suggest that the complex interaction between heterozygote advantage and pleiotropic effects maintains color variability through a balance between multiple and competing selective pressures in wild populations.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsColorFemaleHeterozygotePolymorphism, GeneticWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID36633269
OpenAlexW4315707220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.