Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633072›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2023

[Recent advances in the research of chromatographic separation materials based on click chemistry].

Jiabi Xu, Yue Cheng, Xinling Lu, Xiaoning Jin, Yong Wang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiabi XuSchool of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Yue ChengSchool of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Xinling LuSchool of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Xiaoning JinSchool of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Yong WangSchool of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Nobel Laureate K. B. Sharpless first introduced the concept of click chemistry in 2001, such reactions have become a powerful modular synthesis tool. Click chemistry reactions have rapidly expanded into many scientific fields, such as materials and life science, owing to their distinct advantages, which include mild conditions, fast reaction rates, high yields, low by-product generation, and simple separation and purification procedures. Nowadays, click chemistry reactions have become an essential means of designing and preparing separation materials; thus, interest in this synthetic technique has quickly grown. Here, the development of click chemistry and its unique advantages are briefly described firstly. The reports on click chemistry-based chromatographic separation materials published in the past five years are then systematically reviewed, focusing on two major separation fields: column chromatography and membrane chromatography. Meanwhile, recent advances in the separation materials obtained from three common types of click reactions, namely, azido-alkyne, thiol-alkene, and thiol-alkyne, are summarized. Finally, an outlook on the future of click chemistry is provided in developing efficient chromatographic separation materials.

Indexed as

ChromatographyClick ChemistryAlkynesSulfhydryl CompoundsAlkynesSulfhydryl Compoundschromatographic separation materialsclick chemistrycolumn chromatographymembrane chromatography

Identifiers

PMID36633072
PMCPMC9837675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.