Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632844›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2023

Invited Commentary: On the Mathematization of Epidemiology as a Socially Engaged Quantitative Science.

Abigail R Cartus, Brandon D L Marshall

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abigail R Cartus
Brandon D L Marshall

Funding

Reducing Drug-Related Mortality Using Predictive Analytics: A Randomized, Statewide, Community Intervention TrialR01DA046620 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA, MARSHALL, BRANDON DAVID LEWIS · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring that patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) have access to optimal medication therapies is a critical challenge in substance use epidemiology. Rudolph et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2023;XXX(X):XXXX-XXXX) demonstrated that sophisticated data-adaptive statistical techniques can be used to learn optimal, individualized treatment rules that can aid providers in choosing a medication treatment modality for a particular patient with OUD. This important work also highlights the effects of the mathematization of epidemiologic research. Here, we define mathematization and demonstrate how it operates in the context of effectiveness research on medications for OUD using the paper by Rudolph et al. as a springboard. In particular, we address the normative dimension of mathematization and how it tends to resolve a fundamental tension in epidemiologic practice between technical sophistication and public health considerations in favor of more technical solutions. The process of mathematization is a fundamental part of epidemiology; we argue not for eliminating it but for balancing mathematization and technical demands equally with practical and community-centric public health needs.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineEpidemiologic StudiesHumansPublic HealthAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineepidemiologic methodsmathematizationmedication for opioid use disorderopioid use disordertreatment rules

Identifiers

PMID36632844
PMCPMC10423628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.