Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632704›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2023

GhWRKY41 forms a positive feedback regulation loop and increases cotton defence response against Verticillium dahliae by regulating phenylpropanoid metabolism.

Shenghua Xiao, Yuqing Ming, Qin Hu, Zhengxiu Ye, Huan Si, Shiming Liu, Xiaojun Zhang, Weiran Wang, Yu Yu, Jie Kong and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Horticulture research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GbWAKL20 Phosphorylates GbNFYB8 to Modulate Verticillium Wilt Resistance in Cotton.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Enhanced resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shenghua XiaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuqing MingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qin HuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhengxiu YeNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huan SiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shiming LiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaojun ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Weiran WangInstitute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinjiang, China.
Yu YuXinjiang Academy of Agricultural & Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, China.
Jie KongInstitute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinjiang, China.
Steven J KlostermanUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Salinas, CA, USA.
Keith LindseyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Xianlong ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-524X
Alifu AierxiInstitute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinjiang, China.
Longfu ZhuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-8609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the established significance of WRKY proteins and phenylpropanoid metabolism in plant immunity, how WRKY proteins modulate aspects of the phenylpropanoid pathway remains undetermined. To understand better the role of WRKY proteins in plant defence, we identified a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) protein, GhWRKY41, that is, universally and rapidly induced in three disease-resistant cotton cultivars following inoculation with the plant pathogenic fungus, Verticillium dahliae. We show that overexpression of GhWRKY41 in transgenic cotton and Arabidopsis enhances resistance to V. dahliae, while knock-down increases cotton more susceptibility to the fungus. GhWRKY41 physically interacts with itself and directly activates its own transcription. A genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), in combination with RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses, revealed that 43.1% of GhWRKY41-binding genes were up-regulated in cotton upon inoculation with V. dahliae, including several phenylpropanoid metabolism master switches, receptor kinases, and disease resistance-related proteins. We also show that GhWRKY41 homodimer directly activates the expression of GhC4H and Gh4CL, thereby modulating the accumulation of lignin and flavonoids. This finding expands our understanding of WRKY-WRKY protein interactions and provides important insights into the regulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plant immune responses by a WRKY protein.

Indexed as

AscomycotaVerticilliumAcremoniumDisease ResistanceFeedbackGene Expression Regulation, PlantGossypiumPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlant ProteinscottonGh4CLGhC4HGhWRKY41phenylpropanoid metabolismVerticillium dahliae

Identifiers

PMID36632704
PMCPMC10106861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.