Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632649›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

Optimal sampling for positive only electronic health record data.

Seong-H Lee, Yanyuan Ma, Ying Wei, Jinbo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seong-H LeeDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7320-6788
Yanyuan MaDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-0758
Ying WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Jinbo ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
Precision Assessment and Delivery of Cancer Risks in BRCA 1/2 Mutation CancersR01CA207365 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI CHEN, JINBO, REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Data and Information Integration for Risk Prediction in the Era of Big DataR01CA236468 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, JINBO · 2019 to 2024
$2.2M
Multi-omics approaches for gene discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.RF1AG072272 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI IONITA, IULIANA, WEI, YING · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
Develop quantile analysis tools for sequencing and eQTL studiesR01HG008980 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEI, YING · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Electronic Health Record DataR01HL138306 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, JINBO · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
Multi-omics approaches for gene discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.R01AG072272 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI IONITA, IULIANA, WEI, YING · 2024 to 2024
$552k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207365NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236468NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008980NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138306NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG072272NIH HHS R01-1RF1AG072272NIH HHS R01-CA207365NIH HHS R01-HG008980NIH HHS R01-HL138306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying a patient's disease/health status from electronic medical records is a frequently encountered task in electronic health records (EHR) related research, and estimation of a classification model often requires a benchmark training data with patients' known phenotype statuses. However, assessing a patient's phenotype is costly and labor intensive, hence a proper selection of EHR records as a training set is desired. We propose a procedure to tailor the best training subsample with limited sample size for a classification model, minimizing its mean-squared phenotyping/classification error (MSE). Our approach incorporates "positive only" information, an approximation of the true disease status without false alarm, when it is available. In addition, our sampling procedure is applicable for training a chosen classification model which can be misspecified. We provide theoretical justification on its optimality in terms of MSE. The performance gain from our method is illustrated through simulation and a real-data example, and is found often satisfactory under criteria beyond MSE.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHumansPhenotypeelectronic health recordsmean-squared erroroptimal samplingpositive only

Identifiers

PMID36632649
PMCPMC10333453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.