ArticleBiometrics2023
Optimal sampling for positive only electronic health record data.
Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying a patient's disease/health status from electronic medical records is a frequently encountered task in electronic health records (EHR) related research, and estimation of a classification model often requires a benchmark training data with patients' known phenotype statuses. However, assessing a patient's phenotype is costly and labor intensive, hence a proper selection of EHR records as a training set is desired. We propose a procedure to tailor the best training subsample with limited sample size for a classification model, minimizing its mean-squared phenotyping/classification error (MSE). Our approach incorporates "positive only" information, an approximation of the true disease status without false alarm, when it is available. In addition, our sampling procedure is applicable for training a chosen classification model which can be misspecified. We provide theoretical justification on its optimality in terms of MSE. The performance gain from our method is illustrated through simulation and a real-data example, and is found often satisfactory under criteria beyond MSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.