Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632576›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology2022

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Review of What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Emerging Treatment Strategies.

Zoe McKinnell, Daniel Karel, Daniel Tuerff, Marwa Sh Abrahim, Samah Nassereddine

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Targeting DESI2 as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for JAK2-Mutant Leukemias.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zoe McKinnellDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-2351
Daniel KarelDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel TuerffDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Marwa Sh AbrahimDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Samah NassereddineDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arising from myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) represents a small subtype of secondary AML (sAML). This entity is well known to be associated with poor responses to available treatment options and dismal outcomes. To date, there are no standardized treatment options and there has been very little therapeutic advancement in recent years. This is a stark contrast to other subsets of AML for which there have been significant advances in therapeutic approaches, especially for patients with targetable mutations. We aim to focus our review on the incidence, risk factors for leukemogenesis, pathogenesis, molecular landscape, and emerging therapeutic options in post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia (post-MPN AML).

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaAllogeneic stem cell transplantationChemotherapyHypomethylating agentsMyelofibrosisMyeloproliferative neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36632576
PMCPMC9822656
OpenAlexW4313523467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.