Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632494›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2022

Submit It Again! Learning From Rejected Manuscripts.

Kendall M Campbell, Judy C Washington, Donna Baluchi, José E Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Clear, Succinct Research Question Portends the Rest of the Story.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kendall M CampbellDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Judy C WashingtonOverlook Family Medicine Residency, Atlantic Medical Group at Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ.
Donna BaluchiEccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT.
José E RodríguezDepartments of Family Medicine and Health Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rejection of manuscripts by academic journals can be devastating for the early-career family medicine faculty members. Taking experience from teaching early-career underrepresented in medicine faculty members writing and scholarship skills, we identify and explain five lessons to be learned from rejected manuscripts. The five lessons are: (1) rejections teach journal scope, (2) rejections teach process, (3) rejection should lead to resubmission, (4) rejections reflect writing effort, and (5) rejections happen to papers, not authors. Early-career family medicine faculty can use these lessons for reassurance and to adapt behaviors to remain in the scholarship arena.

Identifiers

PMID36632494
PMCPMC9829009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.