Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632470›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in endocrine and metabolic research2022

Analysis of wearable time series data in endocrine and metabolic research.

Azure D Grant, Thomas J Upton, John R Terry, Benjamin L Smarr, Eder Zavala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Human-Centric Lighting Research and Policy in the Melanopsin Age.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Azure D GrantHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, United States of America.
Thomas J UptonLaboratories for Integrative Neuroscience and Endocrinology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 3NY, United Kingdom.
John R TerryCentre for Systems Modelling & Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Benjamin L SmarrDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 92093, United States of America.
Eder ZavalaCentre for Systems Modelling & Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many hormones in the body oscillate with different frequencies and amplitudes, creating a dynamic environment that is essential to maintain health. In humans, disruptions to these rhythms are strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality. While mathematical models can help us understand rhythm misalignment, translating this insight into personalised healthcare technologies requires solving additional challenges. Here, we discuss how combining minimally invasive, high-frequency biosampling technologies with wearable devices can assist the development of hormonal surrogates. We review bespoke algorithms that can help analyse multidimensional, noisy, time series data and identify wearable signals that could constitute clinical proxies of endocrine rhythms. These techniques can support the development of computational biomarkers to support the diagnosis and management of endocrine and metabolic conditions.

Indexed as

Computer algorithmsHormone dynamicsPersonalised medicinePrecision medicineTime series analysisWearables

Identifiers

PMID36632470
PMCPMC9823090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.