Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632416›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Cabotegravir-Global Access to Long-Acting Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV.

Toby Pepperrell, Samuel Cross, Andrew Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global HIV Incidence Analysis and Implications for Affordability Using Long-Acting Cabotegravir Versus Continuous and Event-Driven Oral Preexposure Prophylaxis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toby PepperrellSchool of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Samuel CrossSchool of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew HillDepartment of Translational Medicine, Liverpool University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis, cabotegravir, has greater efficacy and acceptability than oral tenofovir/emtricitabine for prevention of HIV infection. Cabotegravir is currently priced at $22 200 per year, >185 times higher than the $60-$119 estimated cost-effectiveness threshold for middle-income countries (MICs). Following civil society pressure, ViiV provided access to generic versions in 90 countries with the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), including all African nations. However, several MICs outside Africa have rapidly growing HIV epidemics. We analyzed the ViiV-MPP deal to assess population covered and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. There were 38 countries excluded from the ViiV-MPP deal despite having a GDP per capita lower than the highest-earning African country. These countries include 2.4 billion people (30% global population), with an incidence of 122 000 (8%). For cabotegravir to have a significant impact on HIV infections, millions will need to be treated at affordable prices in a wide range of countries.

Indexed as

accesscabotegravirHIVPrEP

Identifiers

PMID36632416
PMCPMC9830540
OpenAlexW4311562688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.