Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632372›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023

Medication errors in community pharmacies: Evaluation of a standardized safety program.

Shaleesa Ledlie, Tara Gomes, Lisa Dolovich, Chantelle Bailey, Saira Lallani, Delia Sinclair Frigault, Mina Tadrous

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaleesa LedlieLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa DolovichLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chantelle BaileyOntario College of Pharmacists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saira LallaniOntario College of Pharmacists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Delia Sinclair FrigaultOntario College of Pharmacists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACanadian Pharmacists Association · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The mandated reporting of medication-related errors in community pharmacies including incidents resulting in inappropriate medication use and near misses intercepted before reaching the patient can be utilized as learning opportunities to aid in the prevention of future events. Objectives: To examine reporting uptake, trends, and initial learnings from medication errors reported by community pharmacists to the Assurance and Improvement in Medication Safety (AIMS) Program based in Ontario, Canada between April 1st, 2018, and June 30th, 2021. Methods: A descriptive analysis was conducted of all events reported to the AIMS Program during the study period. The web-based reporting form includes a series of mandatory and optional fields completed by the reporter. Individual medications were grouped into broader classes prior to conducting the analysis. Results: Among the 31,768 event reports received from 2856 community pharmacies, there were 19,639 incidents and 12,129 near misses. Low reporting followed by a rapid increase was observed during expansion of the AIMS Program in 2018, with almost 60% of Ontario community pharmacies submitting at least 1 event over the study period. In most cases (90.5%), no patient harm was reported. The most frequent event types involved the incorrect drug (19.5%), concentration (17.2%) or quantity (14.5%). Approximately 25% of events were identified by the involved patient or their agent. When looking at medication classes, antihypertensives, opioids and antidepressants were involved in over one-quarter of overall and higher severity events. Environmental staffing problems and interruptions were the contributory factor and sub-factor most frequently reported, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides insights into engagement with the AIMS Program by Ontario community pharmacy teams since implementation in 2018. The identification of the circumstances and medications associated with both incidents and near misses, aids in the continued development of strategies and processes to help prevent future events.

Indexed as

AIMS, Assurance and Improvement in Medication SafetyCommunity pharmacyMedication errorsOCP, Ontario College of PharmacistsPharmacistsPharmacy staff

Identifiers

PMID36632372
PMCPMC9827048
OpenAlexW4313418958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.